Search results

1

Co mają wspólnego House of Cards i Machiavelli? O pożytkach z wizualizacji problemu filozoficznego w nauczaniu historii idei

100%

Czarnecka A.

Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne

|

2015

|

vol. 67

|

issue 1

335-344

PL

W moim artykule zastanawiam się nad możliwością zrobienia użytku z jednego z najbardziej reprezentatywnych elementów kultury popularnej, czyli seriali. W pierwszej części stawiam pytanie o wartość seriali jako takichw dydaktyce historii doktryn politycznych i prawnych. Nie ograniczam się jednak do refl eksji czysto teoretycznej i dlatego w części drugiej omawiam, poparte własnym doświadczeniem dydaktycznym, studium przypadku – pokazuję, jak można posłużyć się amerykańskim serialem House of Cards, by przybliżyć studentom doktrynę N. Machiavellego.

2

Taming Egoism: Adam Smith on Empathy, Imagination and Justice

100%

Czarnecka A.

Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa

|

2017

|

vol. 10

|

issue Special Issues

29-37

EN

I argue that the construction of the social order, as shown by Adam Smith in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, depends on people’s ability to tame their inborn egoism. According to the philosopher’s anthropological assumptions a human being learns through life experiences how to control his self-interest so that it does not threaten societal existence. During socialization, a human being – still an egoist to some extent – continues role-playing by the use of the psychological mechanisms of empathy and imagination. As a result he develops sympathy, at first, as a reaction to real people’s emotions experienced in a particular context. Finally, he naturally and more and more unconsciously takes under consideration the perspective of an impartial spectator. The gradually developing process brings about consequences that improve social morality, such as control over the expression of intense emotions, which is a condition for experiencing emotional harmony, or a refrain from pursuing one’s self-interest at the expense of someone else, so as not to become a subject of social contempt. One should also bear in mind that none of these consequences was carefully planned in advance nor purposefully executed.

3

The Network on/of Power Relationships: What Can Be Seen through Michel Foucault’s Lens?

100%

Czarnecka A.

Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa

|

2018

|

vol. 11

|

issue 3

357-370

EN

The objective of this paper is to examine two issues related both to Michel Foucault’s philosophy of power and to Sidney Lumet’s movie, Network; here interpreted through Foucauldian categories. The first problem concerns answering the question about the integrity of Foucault’s oeuvre on power. The second one refers to the tension between two individualizing strategies: first, individualization by power, and second, the autonomous creation of self-identity by the use of the technologies of the self, present within the context of the philosopher’s debate over power. We use Network as a framework for developing our argumentative line in both discussions. “From Foucault to Network” is not the only interpretative direction adopted in this paper. What we would like to achieve is to make of the article itself a kind of network where the conclusions we arrive at after having watched the film help us to better understand the philosopher’s theory; thus, the direction “from Network to Foucault” is justified as well.

Refine search results

2 Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa

1 Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne

3 Czarnecka A.

1 2018

1 2017

1 2015

Co mają wspólnego House of Cards i Machiavelli? O pożytkach z wizualizacji problemu filozoficznego w nauczaniu historii idei

Taming Egoism: Adam Smith on Empathy, Imagination and Justice

The Network on/of Power Relationships: What Can Be Seen through Michel Foucault’s Lens?