Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper describes the question of the principle of equality in social law against the background of permissible differentiation and its justification. The author refers to the axiology of social law as an instrument of social policy by presenting the function of social law. He discusses the question of social justice as distributive justice, and defines the principle of social solidarity and the principle of the common good as the most important for the healthcare system.
PL
Przedmiotem opracowania jest wyrok TSUE z 29 października 2020 r. w sprawie C-243/19. Zostały w nim omówione dwa istotne zagadnienia: 1) czy przekonania religijne pacjenta mogą stanowić przesłankę wydania uprzedniej zgody, o której mowa w art. 20 ust. 2 rozporządzenia nr 883/2004 i w art. 8 ust. 5 i 6d dyrektywy nr 2011/24, 2) różnica pomiędzy zasadami zwrotu kosztów transgranicznej opieki zdrowotnej określonymi w rozporządzeniu 883/2004 i w dyrektywie nr 2011/24.
EN
The subject of this paper is the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union from 29 October 2020 in case C-243/19. There are two important issues discussed: 1) if the patient's religious beliefs might be a reason for granting the prior authorization accordingto articles: 20(2) of Regulation No. 883/2004 and 8(5) and (6)(d) of Directive 2011/24, 2) the difference between the rules of the reimbursement of costs of cross-board healthcare set in the Regulation No. 883/2004 and in the Directive 2011/24.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.