Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Organizacja i przebieg I i II synodu na ziemi sandomierskiej

100%

Lipiński G.

Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej

2019

issue 26

225-240

When Pope Pius VII erected the diocese, Poland was partitioned, and the partitioners did not accepted conducting the diocesan Synod. The first synod of the diocese took place in 1923, when the situation in the country allowed it. The purpose of this synod was to specify particular Church Law. The post-war period was characterized by numerous problems, among which the issue of relations with the communist authorities was at the forefront. They tried to influence the Church and claimed the right to approve priests for pastoral posts. They also removed religion from schools, and took part in church buildings. The activities of religious associations were forbidden. Religious life has centred around churches in such a difficult situation. Sacraments were performed here and the ministry of teaching was carried out. The catechization of children and youth took place in parish rooms (rented garages, barracks or rooms). The pre-marital catechesis was gradually spread. On 21st November 1996, Bishop Wacław Świerzawski convened the Second Synod of the Diocese of Sandomierz. In December of the same year, individual synod commissions began to work. Most of them were divided into subcommittees, which the Commission for Church Structures divided into sections. Issues were assigned to be elaborated by individual sub-commissions and sections. They started with studying the relevant Council documents, papal documents, norms of common and particular law of the Diocese of Sandomierz, Przemyśl, Lublin and Tarnów. The work on Synodal legislation lasted until 16th April 1999, when they gathered for the last, fifth plenary session of the Synod.

Ujęcie zasad na gruncie prawa karnego procesowego

100%

Lipiński G.

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

2024

vol. 40

issue 3

54-67

The aim of this article is to present various ways of defining the principles of law in criminal procedural law and to examine whether the science of the Polish criminal procedure draws on the achievements of general theory of law or whether it attempts to create its own concept in this regard. In this study, in order to answer the research question, an analysis is conducted of both current and historical perception of principles in the criminal procedure and an assessment is made of the extent to which individual authors rely on the traditional model of perception of the principles of law, or whether they apply their own viewpoint in this regard due to what they see as particularities of the criminal procedure or the incompatibility of general concepts. The result of the presented work is an answer to the question how the principles of law are perceived in the Polish criminal procedure, taking into account the division into the principles of criminal procedure, the main principles of criminal procedure in an abstract or concrete understanding, the principles of criminal proceedings as defined or undefined principles, codified or uncodified ones, or as codified and defined principles, codified and undefined ones, or uncodified ones, as well as lists of these principles and their systems.

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie różnych sposobów definiowania zasad prawa na gruncie procesualistyki karnej i zbadanie, czy nauka polskiego procesu karnego czerpie z osiągnięć ogólnej teorii prawa, czy też podejmuje próby utworzenia własnej koncepcji w tym zakresie. W niniejszym opracowaniu, w celu odpowiedzi na postawione pytanie badawcze, dokonuje się analizy postrzegania zarówno aktualnego, jak i historycznego, zasad w procesie karnym i oceny w jakim stopniu poszczególni autorzy opierają się na tradycyjnym modelu postrzegania zasad prawa, czy też z uwagi na ich zdaniem specyfikę procesu karnego lub niekompatybilność koncepcji ogólnych stosują autorską optykę w tym zakresie. Rezultatem przedstawionej pracy jest odpowiedź w jaki sposób postrzega się zasady prawa w polskim procesie karnym, z uwzględnieniem podziału na zasady procesu karnego, zasady naczelne procesu karnego w ujęciu abstrakcyjnym i konkretnym, zasady karnoprocesowe jako zasady zdefiniowane lub niezdefiniowane, skodyfikowane lub nieskodyfikowane albo skodyfikowane i zdefiniowane, skodyfikowane i niezdefiniowane lub nieskodyfikowane, a także katalogów tychże zasad oraz ich systemów.

Refine search results

1 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

1 Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej

2 Lipiński G.

1 2024

1 2019

Search results

Organizacja i przebieg I i II synodu na ziemi sandomierskiej

Ujęcie zasad na gruncie prawa karnego procesowego