Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pragnienie i zamiar: przyczynek do dystynkcji pojęć

100%
Seel G.
Ethics in Progress
|
2014
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
21-36
PL
To answer the title question there has been initially introduced the elements of the Aristotle theory in order to confront it with the concepts of the linguistic paradigm philosophers. Finally, the author proposes a very own solution to this dilemma. Accordingly to the methodology of the linguistic paradigm, the paper brings about an analyse of the linguistic expressions to investigate whether they provide a sufficient premise to distinguish between desires and intentions. The author asks several questions which help him describe desires, and them confront achieved characteristics with the essential features of intentions. In conclusion, the paper put forward the case of the explanation of actions according to both desires and intentions
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Jak dalece możemy naturalizować filozofię praktyczną?

100%
Seel G.
Ethics in Progress
|
2010
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
42-56
PL
Zanim jeszcze Quine został prorokiem naturalizmu (Quine, 1969a, s. 83; 1969b, ss. 26-127), na gruncie filozofii analitycznej do dobrego tonu należało 'naturalizowanie' wszelkich możliwych dziedzin filozofii: starano się zamienić je w domenę przyrodoznawstwa, a przede wszystkim w domenę empiryzmu.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy jesteśmy odpowiedzialni za nasze działania?

100%
Seel G.
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
|
2015
|
vol. 4
|
issue 1
44-67
EN
The article discusses a responsibility game which is, in fact a ‘question-answer-game’. Firstly, the characteristic of the responsibility game is made. Secondly, the ontology of the responsibility game is settled. Thirdly, the causality of our intentions and the process of decision making are analysed in-depth. Fourthly, the importance of a decision criterion for the process of decisionmaking is proven; whereby, a definition of an action an agent is morally responsible for is finally formulated.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.