Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
Lud
|
2011
|
vol. 95
45-66
EN
There is a clear rift between actual aims and the potential of cultural anthropology, as the discipline directed at critical and reflexive study of contemporaneity, and its place in university structures and state institutions in Poland. This phenomenon is accompanied by the stereotype of ethnology and anthropology in common sense, inherited from ethnography, which in the past time was entangled in the politics of “folk”. The author discusses the reasons for the classification of anthropology as an auxiliary science of history, asks questions about scientific politics and emphasises the significance of an academic ethnographic laboratory as an original educational project. The author describes two examples presenting her experience of cooperation with historians. One is cooperation between the historians and the anthropologist at the Expert Committee of the Ministry of Education for the improvement of history and geography textbooks. The other is the cooperation between the anthropologist and the historian during the research project on contemporary cultural practices in the Polish-Ukrainian borderland. Both types of cooperation are linked by interest in the borderland, the concept which opens up a space for negotiations between anthropology and history. This concept has many meanings and is metaphorical, which could be a methodological trap. Therefore it was presented as the key category of those two specific projects. In the end the author describes her own research project as an attempt at the implementation of the critical anthropology of the borderland.
2
100%
Stan Rzeczy
|
2011
|
issue 1(1)
131-145
PL
Demonologia w antropologii a refleksyjność zwrotna. Teodycea jako kosmologiczna egzegeza i strategia społeczna: zrzucenie na kogoś–coś winy za niesprawiedliwość świata; punkt wyjścia oskarżeń o praktyki magiczne (Michael Herzfeld). Teodycea ślepym zaułkiem racjonalizacji wiary religijnej w hermeneutyce Paula Ricoeura: krytyka schematu odpłaty. Przemiany w polskiej etno-antropologii ostatnich 30 lat na przykładzie stosunku do demonologii. Systematyka demonów Kazimierza Moszyńskiego a doświadczenie „niewidzialnego ludu” Kirsten Hastrup: opozycja wyjściowa dla konstrukcji typu idealnego, przedstawiającego stosunek badacza do zjawisk nadnaturalnych: pomiędzy rejestracją faktów a ich konstruowaniem, irracjonalną fantazją ludu a wyobraźnią jako potencjalnym czynnikiem społecznej zmiany. Mechanizm bricolage’u techniką wyobraźni – i myśli symbolicznej. Uniwersum demonologii opracowane w polskiej etnologii lat 70/80. otwarte na analizę w kategoriach faktów społecznych.
EN
Demonology in anthropology and the reflexivity. Theodicy as a cosmological exegesis and a social strategy blaming someone/something for the injustice of the world; the starting point for accusations of magical practices (Michael Herzfeld). Theodicy as a cul-de-sac of rationalizing religious faith in Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics; critique of the retribution scheme. Transformations of Polish ethno-anthropology in the last 30 years from the perspective of demonology. Between the Kazimierz Moszynski’s taxonomy of demons and the Kirsten Hastrup’s experience of the „invisible people”: the basic dichotomy for constructing of the „ideal type” of the anthropologists’ attitude to the supernatural phenomena; between the recording of facts and their construction, irrational folk fantasy and imagination as a potential agent of social change. Bricolage as a technique of imagination and of symbolic thinking. The universe of demonology elaborated by Polish ethnology in the 70s and 80s open to analysis in terms of social facts.
PL
Artykuł recenzyjny  książki Agnieszki Halemby Negotiating Marian Apparitions. The Politics of Religion in Transcarpathian Ukraine. Budapest, New York: Central European University Press 2015, ss. 312.
EN
I present multi-sensory memories from my field research that keep imbuing encounters with people and other beings with specific meaning. Such memories combine dialogues with pictures, sounds, smells and tastes, and can be conceived of as inspiration underly- ing ethnographic and anthropological research. In this context, I reflect on the method of teaching skills of ethnographic field research within “Ethnographic Laboratories”, a module introduced as part of the teaching curriculum at the Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, University of Warsaw.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.