Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Związki międzygminne i związki powiatów w aspekcie oddziaływań nadzorczych

100%
Kruszewska-Gagoś M.
Administracja Teoria Dydaktyka Praktyka
|
2014
|
issue 1(34)
78-112
EN
Associations of territorial self-governmental units are established in order to perform public tasks belonging to the scope of activity of the association’s participants. The units of the territorial self-government in the range of binding acts, have a liberty to undertake a decision on co-operation, determination of the scope of the subject cooperation and creating organisational structures of cooperation. A public law associa-tion created by units of the territorial self-government takes over to perform public tasks, determined in the statute. Activity of the self-government associations is subject of supervision on analogous principles to supervision over activity of the units of the territorial self-government. Beside the supervision performed by the regional clearing houses in the scope of financial matters and supervi-sion exercised by the Prime Minister, a particular role is fulfilled by su-pervision of a Voivode over the public law associations of the territorial self-government units. A Voivode as a supervisory organ has the right to require informa-tion concerning the organisation and functioning of an association, in-dispensable to perform powers vested in it. Chairman of the association board is obliged to submit to the Voivode resolutions of the general meeting within 7 days since the date of passing them, The scope of the Voivode’s supervisory intervention should be proportional to the im-portance of the protection subject. In relation with this the Voivode should apply only such supervision means, which will enable realisation of the supervision aim – verification of infringement of the law and si-multaneously in the least possible degree curtail the scope of rights of the association of the territorial self-government units. Realisation of this principle in Polish law is certified by progression of infringement of the law, resulting from the law on system, making dependent a type of actions undertaken by a supervisory organ on inessential or essential breach of the law. The Voivode performs evaluation of a resolution of the association meeting, considering its compliance with the law. Depending on a degree of infringement of the law (inessential or essential) the Voivode states that the resolution was passed with infringement of the law or declares nullity of the unlawful resolution. The problems of inter-communal associations and associations of counties has not been so far underlined in a due measure by the legisla-tor. In the law on system there predominate transmissions to separate regulations and some regulations by law require to be made more pre-cise because of appearing divergences in interpretation of provisions. A certain gap in this scope could be supplemented by new regula-tions by law. The bill draft of 4 November 2013 on alteration of the Act on Communal Self-Government and on alteration of some other acts heads to simplification of the hitherto procedure of change of the statute of an inter-communal association and registration of inter-self-government associations. The bill draft realises assumptions of the bill draft on improvement of functioning and organisation of performance of public tasks by territorial self-government units approved on 11 June 2013 by the Council of Ministers.
2

Wybór oferty najkorzystniejszej jako cel postępowania o udzielenie zamówienia publicznego

100%
Kruszewska-Gagoś M.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2015
|
vol. 25
|
issue 2
171-192
PL
Celem artykułu jest zwrócenie uwagi na uwarunkowania prawne wyboru najkorzystniejszej oferty i problemy praktyczne występujące na kanwie stosowania poszczególnych przepisów ustawy z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych i innych ustaw. Zamawiający wybiera ofertę najkorzystniejszą na podstawie kryteriów oceny ofert określonych w specyfikacji istotnych warunków zamówienia. Najkorzystniejszą ofertą jest oferta, która przedstawia najkorzystniejszy bilans ceny i innych kryteriów odnoszących się do przedmiotu zamówienia publicznego albo oferta z najniższą ceną. W tym kontekście szczególnego znaczenia nabiera wskazanie przez zamawiającego kryteriów oceny ofert i sposobu operowania poszczególnymi kryteriami. Nowelizacja ustawy Prawo zamówień publicznych z dnia 29 sierpnia 2014 r. ukierunkowana została między innymi na rzecz wyboru ofert gwarantujących najlepszą relację jakości do ceny na podstawie pozacenowych kryteriów oceny ofert, w tym kryteriów środowiskowych, jakości, wartości technicznej. Tego rodzaju modyfikacje determinują również konieczność wzmocnienia kwalifikacji pracowników zamawiającego, w szczególności komisji przetargowej, w zakresie umiejętności właściwego sprecyzowania kryteriów pozacenowych. Praktyka stosowania nowych rozwiązań pozwoli wkrótce odpowiedzieć na pytanie, czy założenia ustawodawcy, które towarzyszyły nowelizacji przepisów ustawy Prawo zamówień publicznych, przyniosły oczekiwane rezultaty.
EN
The objective of this article is to draw attention to legal conditions related to choosing the most advantageous tender and practical problems occurring on the basis of applying individual provisions of the Public Procurement Act of 29 January 2004 and other acts. Contracting authority chooses the most advantageous tender on the basis of criteria for evaluation of tenders determined in the specification of essential terms of the contract. The most advantageous tender is such a tender that presents the most advantageous balance of price and other criteria related to the subject-matter of the contract or a tender with the lowest price. In this context the indication of criteria for evaluation of tenders and the method of operating individual criteria by contracting authority grows in importance. Amendment of the Public Procurement Act of 29 August 2014 concentrated on, inter alia, the choice of tenders that guarantee the best relation of value for money on the basis of non-price criteria for evaluation of tenders, including environmental, quality and technical value criteria. Such alternations also determine the need to enhance qualifications of contracting authority’s employees, especially qualifications of tender committee, in respect of the ability to properly specify non-price criteria. The practice of applying new solutions shall soon answer the question, whether the assumptions of legislator that accompanied the amendment of provisions of the Public Procurement Act have produced expected results.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.