Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Rejent

  2. 1 Forum Prawnicze

Authors help

  1. 3 Mleko Ł.

Years help

  1. 2 2023

  2. 1 2011

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Wpis właściciela przedsiębiorstwa w spadku do księgi wieczystej

100%
Mleko Ł.
Rejent
|
2023
|
issue 11 (391)
45-73
EN
It has been 5 years already since the Act of 5 July 2018 on the succession management of a natural person’s enterprise and other facilities related to the succession of enterprises entered into force. However, the question (accompanying this Act from the very beginning) of who should be registered in the land and mortgage register, as the subject entitled to the item acquired by the succession manager, incorporated into the inherited enterprise . has not been solved yet. The article conducts a critical analysis of the solutions presented in the doctrine and attempts to take its own position on the indicated legal issue. The considerations made led to the conclusion that the entry should be made in favor of the owners of the inherited enterprise. Assuming that the legal system has not developed the relevant documents certifying such status (i.e. status of the owner of the inherited enterprise), it should be acknowledged, that the disclosure of the legal status, corresponding to the substantive law, in the land and mortgage register is impossible. Presentedsituation disapplys the obligation of the notary, stated in the art. 92 § 4 of the Act of 14 February 1991 Law on Notaries. In such case, to ensure the security of legal transactions, it is necessary to apply for the entry of a warning about the discrepancy of the legal status recorded in the land and mortgage register with the actual legal status, with attached excerpt of the notarial deed (containing the relevant instructions), which shows that there has been a change in the legal status.
2

Kto jest przedsiębiorcą w okresie wykonywania zarządu sukcesyjnego? Rozważania na tle wyroku NSA z 23.11.2021 r., II GSK 1749/21

100%
Mleko Ł.
Rejent
|
2023
|
issue 4 (384)
51-80
EN
The Act from July 5th, 2018, on the succession management of a natural person.s enterprise and other facilities related to the succession of enterprises did not determine who is the entrepreneur within the period of implementation of the succession management. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgement from November 23rd 2021 r., II GSK 1749/21 has decided, that based on the Act, the succession manager gains the entrepreneur status. Hence, he is obliged to fulfill statutory obligations imposed on the entrepreneur and is burdened by the negative consequences of the failure. The article undertakes a critical analysis of the Court.s argumentation. It explains the meanings of the notions .activity on its own behalf. and .activity on someone.s account. used to construct the institution of substitutes and legal definition of an entrepreneur. A view has been expressed, that running an enterprise in succession by a succession manager is not equal to running a business (economic activity) as per the understanding of art. 431 of the Civil Code and art. 4, section 1 and 2 in relation to art. 3 of the Law on Entrepreneurs. A view has been formulated that the entrepreneur in the period of the implementation of the succession management is the owner of the enterprise in succession and that this thesis is equal to the statement that the entrepreneur is the enterprise in succession itself as an organizational unit not having legal capacity. A polemic has been undertaken against doctrinal concepts, granting the status of an entrepreneur to other entities.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O zapisie windykacyjnym i wprowadzeniu do systemu prawnego darowizny na wypadek śmierci

100%
Mleko Ł.
Forum Prawnicze
|
2011
|
issue 4-5 (6-7)
94-111
EN
Both the legacy per vindicationem and the donation mortis causa provide the heir with the possibility of disposing, on the occasion of death, certain objects with the effect in rem. In the work, I am substantiating the allegation that a deed of donation on the occasion of death, despite introducing into the Polish legal system the legacy per vindicationem, still proves to be a useful act that may play an important role in practice. I am doing this by means of juxtaposing the two institutions. The following issues were discussed: the responsibility of beneficiaries on the occasion of death and legatees of the legacy per vindicationem for legacy debts and legitim, the documentation of subrogation and the problem of the appropriate use of article 961 of the Civil Code.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.