Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The major aim of this article is to analyse the concept of revolution and changes within the theory of revolution. Theorising about radical social changes raised questions which still have not been answered: how is revolution different from other social changes? Does it have the beginning and the end? Is it a result of chance or a necessity? Why does it take place at a particular time, in a given place? How does it evolve? These basic problems are still the subject of study today.
PL
Głównym celem artykułu jest analiza historii pojęcia rewolucji i zmian w ramach teorii rewolucji. Teoretyzowanie na temat radykalnych zmian społecznych od początku napotykało podstawowe problemy związane z omawianym zjawiskiem. Szereg pytań nie znalazło ‘ostatecznej’ odpowiedzi: Czym rewolucja różni się od innych zmian społecznych? Czy rewolucja ma początek i koniec? Czy rewolucja jest skutkiem przypadku czy konieczności? Dlaczego do rewolucji dochodzi w tym czasie i na tej przestrzeni? Jak rewolucja ewoluuje? Te podstawowe problemy wciąż są przedmiotem refleksji teoretyków rewolucji. Celem tego artykułu jest zaś wskazanie relacji między historią a teoriami rewolucji, jak i historią samej teorii.
EN
The dynamic development of new technologies, primarily manifested in the rapid and uncontrolled improvement of artificial intelligence models, needs a discussion on the advisability of framing it within regulatory boundaries. Despite widespread interest and clear signalling of the need to control the development of artificial intelligence, a unified approach to the direction of legislative development in this area has not yet been established. Legislative bodies of countries worldwide, particularly those at the forefront of innovation, international organizations, and the creators and providers of modern technological solutions themselves present different attitudes and legislative strategies. The authors express the conviction that the current course of legislative work is dependent not only on objectively occurring factors, including the difficult-to-normatively-capture explosive technological progress, but in fact stems from the cultural characteristics shaping a given legal culture. The aim of this paper is to review and analyze law-making activities in countries/areas dominating the technological market, conditioned by different legal cultures, and to indicate the influence of legal culture on the shape of regulations governing artificial intelligence.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.