Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article is an attempt to clarify the situation after the rise of Slovak State. Its politics, ideology and philosophy of nation. It is focused on philosophy of Š. Polakovič and M. Chladný-Hanoš from the perspective of dogmatism and pluralism in their thoughts. The paper analyse 'ideology of slovakian national socialism', which is faced with Christ's nationalism' and ' German national socialism'.
EN
This article is an attempt to clarify the situation after the rise of Slovak State. Its politics, ideology and philosophy of nation. It is focused on philosophy of Š. Polakovič and M. Chladný-Hanoš from the perspective of dogmatism and pluralism in their thoughts. The paper analyse ‘ideology of slovakian national socialism’, which is faced with ‘Christ’s nationalism’ and ‘ German national socialism’.
EN
This lecture analyzes Štúr's philosophical views. The author emphasize particelarly Štúr's ideological continuity of creation of G. W. F. Hegel. Illustrate Štúr's hegelianism on his understanding oh the spirit as an ontologicaly-substantial principle, the theory of law and the concept of a specific philosophy of Slavic history. In conclusion, author point out that Štúr's reception of Hegel's philosophy was neither explicity „mechanical“, nor one-dimensionally epigone. Point to the fact that Štúr not only likes to quote each of Hegel's views, but he also applicatively modifies them, and indeed often extrapolates creatively to the new ideological and semantic planes, especially the issues connected to Slovak – Slavic cultural and national life.
EN
The aim of this paper is to define the term of transcendence in the 20th century Slovak philosophy. Authors of this paper focus on the using of the term in the work of religious and non-religious Slovak philosophers. The understanding of transcendence in the works of C. Dudáš, S. Š. Osuský and S. Štúr will be analyzed. The paper emphasizes that the using of the term transcendence is in Slovak neotomismus used to define the existence of God. Authors claim that the use of the term transcendence should not be limited to the categorical apparatus of contemporary philosophy of 20th century which defines this term in two different way. The first respects the ontological and epistemological attitude to the notion of transcendence. Second is understood as a fictional notion. Similarly as Kant, authors of this paper believe that transcendence is what is beyond the knowledge, some- thing people can doubt and what is the source of critical philosophical thinking.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.