Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Leonard Nelson and Metaphysical Knowledge against the Neo-Kantian Background

100%
Kubalica T.
Diametros
|
2017
|
issue 52
64-80
EN
Leonard Nelson is known primarily as a critic of epistemology in the Neo-Kantian meaning of the term. The aim of this paper is to investigate the presuppositions and consequences of his critique. I claim that what has rarely been discussed in this context is the problem of the possibility of metaphysics. By the impossibility of epistemology Nelson means the possibility of metaphysical knowledge. I intend to devote this paper to the analysis of this problem in relation to the Neo-Kantian background.
2
Content available remote

Johannes Volkelt a problem metafizyki

100%
Kubalica T.
Estetyka i Krytyka
|
2012
|
issue 4(26)
27-49
XX
The aim of the paper is a historical analysis and evaluate of the metaphysic of neo-Kantian philosopher Johannes Volkelt and of post-neo-Kantian Martin Heidegger. Heidegger’s approach to Kant’s critique of pure reason (transcendental philosophy) as the foundation of metaphysics is not new and it had a major precursor in the metaphysical neo-Kantianism. In the neo-Kantianism was taken inside the question of the possibility of metaphysics, not only as metaphysica specialis, but also as the ontology (metaphysica generalis).
3

Geneza i podstawy filozofii matematyki krytycznej Leonarda Nelsona

100%
Kubalica T.
IDEA. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych
|
2017
|
vol. 29/1
EN
The article concerns the history of philosophical relationships between philosophers and mathematicians associated with the New Friesian School. The aim is to show the complex relationship between the doctrines of the philosophical precursors of this school, such as Immanuel Kant, Jakob Friedrich Fries and Ernst Friedrich Apelt, as well as the presentation of the major philosophical-mathematical inspirations of the mathematician such as David Hilbert. Nelson's mathematical and philosophical relationships with Gerhard Wilhelm Hessenberg and Kurt Grelling have influenced the Neo-Friesian philosophy of critical mathematics.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Marburska krytyka poznania jako odbicia

100%
Kubalica T.
IDEA. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych
|
2011
|
vol. 23
25-41
EN
The article elucidates and assesses the Marburg School’s account of the cognition. The characteristic feature of epistemology from this School is the rejection of the mirroring and acceptance of the cognitive transformation. The criticism of the mirroring theory is implicitly contained in Paul Natorp’s and Hermann Cohen’s cognitive relationism. Ernst Cassirer articulated this critical epistemology in his philosophy of the symbolic form and his conception of the symbolic representation. The historical bases of this criticism has been reconstructed as a main purpose of this article.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Die Beziehung zwischen dem Lehrmeister und dem Schüler in der neukantischen Philosophie

100%
Kubalica T.
IDEA. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych
|
2015
|
vol. 27
383-394
EN
The relationship between the teacher and the student seems to be an integral part of our historical and cultural reality in which contents value are regarded as transmitted from generation to generation. This relationship is a primary type of cell in the transfer of the culture and the best illustration is taken by our academic teaching activity. The aim of the lecture is an attempt to apprehend the essence of the master-student relationship. I present this issue on the basis of selected examples of academic philosophers with reference to four different types of reference scale of the master-student relationship. The community first stage is characterized by the fact that all the members of the founding declare the same philosophical views. The second stage is characterized by the community in which the founder only partially controls the activities of the group and philosophical influences proclaimed by the views of its members. The third level of the community is deprived of the personal control and includes conscious successors and followers of specific aspects of the philosophical activity and the authority of the master. The fourth stage is found in the beliefs of people who unknowingly reproduce existing philosophical beliefs, without the intention to establish the views of their predecessors.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.