Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article is the third part of the triptych published in the subsequent issues of “Ethnography” (2016, 2017), regarding the anthropological concepts and explorations of Tim Ingold. In this part, the author presents a critical analysis of Ingold’s proposals, referring to theories developed within the  contemporary humanities and social sciences by researchers such as Jane Bennett, Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway and Bruno Latour. The article also introduces Ingold’s attitude towards ethnography as a scientific discipline, and explores the possibilities of using his proposals in ethnographic fieldwork.
EN
The aim of the article is to present the opportunities and limitations associated with analyses of the audiosphere in social studies. The author proposes a multi-sensory perspective in her research that enables her to capture the multi-sensory structure of places. In her paper, she describes the development of the anthropology of the senses, methodology of sensory research and forms of representing the data collected in such research. She presents her own experience related to the project “Audiosphere — anthropology of the senses,” pointing at the same time to problems associated with the implementation of such proposals.
EN
Tim Ingold is one of the most interesting contemporary anthropologists, whose works became a source of inspiration not only for other anthropologists, but also for architects, archaeologists, and artists. Although Ingold writes about a variety of topics in a vivid, almost poetic manner, his publications link consistent, original, and ever-evolving theory. The aim of this paper is a reconstruction of Ingold’s theoretical proposal. The present text is the first of a three-part study that will be published in subsequent volumes of “Ethnography”. This section presents Ingold’s considerations regarding the environment (the nature-culture dichotomy) and the elements that form its essence, i.e. weather – “things” (subject--subject dichotomy). In the following articles the author shall present Ingold’s views of the organisms and perception and will try to merge all the elements in order to close the series of articles with a conclusion regarding the possible use of Ingold’s theory in ethnographic research, including sensory ethnography.
EN
The aim of this paper is a reconstruction of Tim Ingold’s theoretical proposal. The present text is the second of a three-part study t hat w ill be published in subsequent volumes of “Ethnography”. This section presents Ingold’s considerations regarding the organism and perception. Author try to merge all the elements (environment, things, organism and perception) in order and present Ingold’s theory. In the following article Author will close the series of articles with a conclusion regarding the possible use of Ingold’s theory in ethnographic research, including sensory ethnography.
5
100%
PL
Ethnology? What do they teach you there? This paper analysis root causes of lack of engaged anthropology in Poland. The major ground of animosity to engage in work that is defined by the problems and not by the discipline author placed in history and „cognitive pessimism”. Author emphasized the need for generate/create new paradigm that will allow practicing of applied anthropology and engaged anthropology, at the same time underlying that anthropologists who block it’s progress also bear the responsibility for the future shape of the discipline.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wprowadzenie

63%
PL
Tematem przewodnim prezentowanego numeru jest uzmysłowione bycie w świecie. Użycie wieloznacznej kategorii uzmysłowienia – zamiast mówienia o zmysłach czy sensualności – ma na celu ukazanie organicznego związku między poszczególnymi sposobami poznawania i doznawania rzeczywistości. Jak bowiem ukazują Autorzy poszczególnych artykułów, trudno oderwać od siebie i badać w odosobnieniu wrażenia zmysłowe, odczucia fizyczne, emocje i przeżycia, a także odnoszące się do nich interpretacje, refleksje i wspomnienia. Równie karkołomnym zadaniem byłoby wyznaczenie czytelnej granicy między tym, co w poznaniu – również w poznaniu zmysłowym – indywidualne i społeczne, biologiczne i kulturowe, bezwolne i świadome. W tym sensie wyodrębnienie kategorii zmysłów czy sensualności ma jedynie ułatwić podjęcie refleksji na temat ludzkiego zanurzenia w świecie – środowisku, wrażeniach, emocjach, myślach – a także wyznaczenie wygodnego punktu wyjścia dla rozważań dotyczących ogólniejszych zjawisk społecznych i wzorów kulturowych, które kształtują zarówno formę, jak i treść poszczególnych doznań. Jak wierzymy, prezentowane artykuły ukazują możliwości, ale i ograniczenia, tego rodzaju antropologicznych eksploracji. Artykuły dotyczące tematyki uzmysłowionego bycia w świecie zostały podzielone na trzy grupy: antropologia i etnografia wobec tematyki zmysłów i uzmysłowienia badania dotyczące odmiennych sposobów doświadczenia i odczuwania rzeczywistości antropologia zmysłów i pamięci.
EN
The article presents basic inspirations, beginnings and development of the anthropology of the senses and sensory ethnography. The main aim is to show the most influential scholars who have had a significant impact on the anthropological debate regarding human sensuality and perception and its connections with culture. The authors discuss general possibilities of this kind of reflection within cultural and social anthropology, as well as the fundamental differences between scholars undertaking such research.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.