Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article is an attempt at presenting the phenomenon of dearchaization based on examples in socio-political lexis. First, the paper presents basic semantic processes occurring in the modern Russian language and explains the reasons for reaching “old” vocabulary: the need for the nomina- tion of objects and phenomena of the changing socio-political reality. The use of the lexis of passive vocabulary is demonstrated with an example of return to the active use of archaisms once labeled in Russian dictionaries with the qualifier “pre-revolutionary”. A separate part is dedicated to confessional lexis, within which a return to original meanings, updating and changes in dictio- nary definitions can be observed.
EN
Political lexis may be divided into two vast divisions: internal policy and external policy. A distinctive quality of foreign policy is the fact that in the international arena exists no one center and the whole policy in point is constituted by relations between states. Therefore the central place is in this case occupied by linguistic elements denominating just political relations and actions. The article is an attempt at a thematic and formative characteristics of the lexical group EXTERNAL POLICY. The first part of the article is thematic classification. On its basis three groups of lexemes have been distinguished. The first one contains general and basic terms which are indispensable to describe the international arena and its entities (e.g. внешняя политика, сверхполитика). The second group consists of expressions for international relations connected with the activity of representations of various states (e.g. дипломат, консул, полпред). The third group includes names of international relations connected with activities of states (integration/separation,signing/cancelling agreements, conflicts between states). The second part of the article is an analysis of selected formative processes within the group EXTERNAL POLICY. It discusses the process of prefixation and the analysis demonstrated inconsiderable variety in this field, since the lexemes noted had only a few prefixes (про-, нео-, меж-, де-, сверх-, супер-). No expressions with the prefixes анти-, контр-, лже-, псевдо-, после, пост-, ультра-, пред- and до- have not been noted.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.