Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Tematy i Konteksty
|
2022
|
vol. 17
|
issue 12
169-181
EN
The aim of this study is a genological analysis of the duo-author book by Wiesław Myśliwski and Tadeusz Bocheński, Myśliwski-Bocheński. Important conversations in the context of the "new version" of "conversations with the writer" in the era of internet culture.The guide to the analysis is the question of how this publication engages in dialogue with the convention of "significant conversations" by Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz, an analyst of the discussion.I ask how the conversations with Wiesław Myśliwski problematize the reflection on literature and literary tradition, the writer's personal narrative and the communicative situation of the conversation.In Myśliwski's and Bocheński's dialogue, tradition, the memory of literature and the attitude towards one's own memories become rather a default system that the recipient should become aware of if he or she wishes to understand the meanings of the conversation between a prose writer and a literary historian.  
PL
Celem niniejszego opracowania jest genologiczna analiza duautorskiej książki Wiesława Myśliwskiego i Tadeusza Bocheńskiego Myśliwski-Bocheński. Rozmowy istotne w kontekście „nowej odsłony” „rozmów z pisarzem” w dobie kultury Internetu. Przewodnikiem po analizie jest pytanie, w jaki sposób publikacja ta podejmuje dialog z konwencją „rozmów istotnych” Stanisława Ignacego Witkiewicza, analityka dyskusji. Pytam o to, w jaki sposób  rozmowy z Wiesławem Myśliwskim problematyzują refleksję na temat literatury i tradycji literackiej, narracji osobistej pisarza i sytuacji komunikacyjnej rozmowy. W dialogu Myśliwskiego i Bocheńskiego tradycja, pamięć literatury i stosunek do własnych wspomnień, staje się raczej układem domyślnym, który odbiorca powinien sobie uświadomić, jeżeli zechce zrozumieć sensy rozmowy prozaika i historyka literatury.    
EN
In the essay the author analyses the problematics of genocide based on correspondence between Filip David and Mirko Kovač Kiedy kwitnie zło. Książka listów 1992–1995 (When evilflourishes. A book of letters 1992–1995) to later juxtapose it with studies on Shoah. She ponders the generational perspective of people whose lives were tarnished by the Nazi-Germany occupation (Filip David – born 1940, Mirko Kovač – born 1938). The article most of all aims at reconstructing the stances of the two authors of letters and showing genocide as a realm of incessant discussion, vague affects, unsystematized knowledge. The author undertakes an attempt to reconstruct only some of the topics and contexts accompanying the issues discussed in David’s and Kovač’s letters, particularly: the soul-searing descriptions of the Bosnian War of 1992–1995. She shows that the language facet of violence proves to be a challenge to reflecting on literature in the correspondence between the two intellectuals. When faced with the disintegration of hitherto social order in the former Yugoslavia, the nationalist discourse, as social studies and research on genocide suggest, prepares the ground for activation of violent behaviours, justifies them, and plays a key role in fomenting the genocidal repression. As a result of the said processes, the authorities create and reinforce nations’ cultural self-images, tighten the control over ethnic purity of collective identity,instigate conflicts between neighbours based on “the blood and soil myth,” cherry-pick the xenophobic discourse of the past, and force through with ethnical interpretations of culture.
Tematy i Konteksty
|
2018
|
vol. 13
|
issue 8
174-184
EN
Michał Cichy is the author of two books Always is today and Let the river flow.The subject of literary reflection of the writer is modern, transient, heterotopic city. Sketch of Grażyna Maroszczuk presents reflections on the literary updating of the city in the metaphor of the “walking book” of peripatetic, observer and resident of Warsaw’s old district of Ochota.
EN
A park is described in this article as a scene of public life where members of the modern society develop their shared forms of behaviour. This is also the perspective of interpretation for the final scene of Witold Gombrowicz’s short story Lawyer Kraykowski’s Dancer. A humorous portrait of manners drawn by the author could constitute a peculiar commentary to the nightlife of the Warsaw parks of the 1920s. A park seems to be a suitable metaphor chosen to tell the story of a lawyer and “a dancer”, as well as of the complex social relations determined by humanizing actions and the feeling of uncertainty about human nature which constantly evades them. The authors of the article are particularly interested in this “uncertain” aspect of nature inscribed in the figure of an urban garden, which reminds us that all our calls for regulation are just an appearance, a veil hiding an always distant phantasm.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.