Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problems of interpretation of law in accordance with the Constitution – Polish construction in historical and comparative aspects

100%
Minich D.
Studia Politologiczne
|
2019
|
vol. 52
227-238
EN
In the light of art. 188 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland The Constitutional Court adjudicates on the compliance of laws and other normative acts with the Constitution. The interpretation of law in accordance with the Constitution has been a key issue since the beginning of the jurisprudential activity of Polish Constitutional Court. It is stressed on the ground of the American doctrine that the problem of interpreting law in line with the constitution raises the need to compare the content of a controlled act with its constitutive pattern. This type of interpretation was defined as an interpretation in harmony with the Constitution. In American constitutionalism two concepts of constitutional interpretation can be distinguish: Living Constitution and Originalism. Nowadays, one can see the emergence of the third way of interpreting the constitution which allows to eliminate the shortcomings of the two mentioned above. This concept, referred to as Non Originalism (or Living Originalism). The model of judicial review was adopted in the USA whereas the model of the constitutional court was introduced in Europe. Austria is widely regarded as the cradle of constitutional judiciary. Hans Kelsen designed a system of constitutional review. He provided the Constitutional Court with the power to scrutinize abstractly the legality of legal acts in terms of their compliance with the Constitution. It was not until the 1960s that the so-called interpretation of laws in accordance with the Constitution appeared in the case-law of this body. The cataclysm of fascism and Nazism ruined constitutional theories based on the primacy of the constitutional law. As the founders of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany of May 23, 1949 were conscious of that, they adopted the solutions of the Austrian model whose essence was the examination of the conformity of legal acts with the constitution. The discussion on the correct methods of interpreting the constitution is the “Archimedes point” of constitutional law. The activity of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and the achievements of the constitutional law in this country had the greatest influence on Polish judicial practice. The Polish name of this institution is a translation of the German term fervassungskonforme Auslegung von Gesetzen.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Między originalism a living constitution – Jacka M. Balkina koncepcja wykładni Konstytucji

100%
Minich D.
Ius Novum
|
2022
|
vol. 16
|
issue 3
130-145
EN
In this paper, I analyse problem of interpretation of the Constitution in American doctrine.Starting point is the distinction between the concept of Originalism and Living Constitution.The author briefly presents the main assumptions of both concepts. On that backgroundexamines the concept by Jack M. Balkin. He described it as Living Originalism. Balkin in histheory combines the best of traditional Originalism and concept of Living Constitution. Hecombined Dworkin’s “moral reading” of the Constitution with traditional Originalism. ForBalkin, Originalism is seen as a initial framework for governance (framework originalism).From Ronald Dworkin, he adopted a distinction between legal rules and legal principles, andthe argument that principles express values. Balkin described his concept of Originalism as“method of text and principle”.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest problem interpretacji konstytucji na gruncie amerykańskiej doktryny.Punktem wyjścia jest rozróżnienie koncepcji oryginalizmu oraz living constitution.Autorka skrótowo przedstawia założenia tych głównych nurtów. Na ich tle analizuje koncepcjęautorstwa Jacka M. Balkina, który określił ją jako living originalism. Balkin w swej konstrukcjiłączy to, co najlepsze w tradycyjnym oryginalizmie i w koncepcji living constitution: moralnąwykładnię konstytucji w ujęciu Ronalda Dworkina z tradycyjnym oryginalizmem. Dla niegooryginalizm to wstępne ramy zarządzania. Od Dworkina przyjął rozróżnienie norm na regułyi zasady oraz tezę, że zasady wyrażają wartości. Balkin określił swoje ujęcie oryginalizmu jako„method of text and principle”.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Sprawozdanie z konferencji naukowej „Prawo jako projekt przyszłości”, Warszawa, 17–18.09.2022 r.

51%
Minich D., Jankowska-Prochot I., Rogacka-Łukasik A.
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
|
2023
|
vol. 1(XXIII)
253-262
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Bezpieczeństwo ludzkości w przyszłości

39%
Szocik K., Lysenko-Ryba K., Minich D., Kędzior A., Banaś S., Mazur S.
Studia Politologiczne
|
2017
|
vol. 45
195-214
EN
In our paper we consider two questions. In the first part, we discuss some philosophical and legal contexts of security. In the second part, we analyze three topics like health policy, migration, and security of supply chain. We argue these three topicswill constitute? key challenges to the guaranteeing of the global security.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.