Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe wobec wyzwań współczesności: migracje i multicentryczność

100%
Pilich M.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 2
335-377
EN
The article discusses issues that are fundamental to shaping the future of private international law: the phenomenon of migration and the so-called multicentricity of creation and application of law. The subject matter of the discussion is the evolution of Savigny’s classical paradigm of private international law as an “arbitrator” between the legal systems of nation states. Modern migrations are characterized by multidirectional population flows and decreasing stability of links between a person and a specific territory; in turn, multicentricity entails the obligation to constantly reconcile various legal rules coming from various law-making centres. The author does not question the advantages of Karl Friedrich von Savigny’s concept, but considers it necessary to reconcile it with the increasingly complicated and eclectic structure of private international law in the first half of the 21st century. The concept of the so-called sovereignty of an individual – an increased importance of individual values at the expense of collective, nation-wide or general public values – causes significant confusion about the concept of “conflict-of-law justice” based on the idea of a “spatially better” law, that is, the closest connection between law and a particular case. Such a specific concept, when confronted with increasingly complex legal structures of today’s world, is experiencing a significant crisis. The term “law of conflict” ceases to be reserved for private international law only, just as conflicts of laws cease to arise only at cross-border level. The solution might consist in turning back to the doctrine of natural law and thus departing from a strictly positivist vision of conflict-law as a finite set of simple rules used to attribute relations to relevant national law systems. Although international private law will certainly not forget about von Savigny, we can assume that it no longer belongs to his legacy.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Mater semper certa est? : kilka uwag o skutkach zagranicznego macierzyństwa zastępczego z perspektywy stosowania klauzuli porządku publicznego

100%
Pilich M.
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego
|
2018
|
vol. 16
7-37
EN
The issue of gestational surrogacy is a serious challenge to Polish and foreign law. The present paper deals with the difficult questions of the assumptions, and the scope of application, of the public policy exception in cases before the Polish courts and authorities - especially in the procedure of the transcription of foreign birth certificates and certifying the Polish nationality acquired by a child born of a surrogate mother and genetically related to his or her sociological parents. Numerous inconsistencies of reasoning in Polish case law and the doctrine of international family law rise doubts about the correctness of the application of the 'ordre public' in most cases of recent years.
3

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2013–2014) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001

63%
Pilich M., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2015
|
vol. 24
|
issue 3
589-691
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The law of international civil procedure thus remains one of the most vividly developing spheres of the European integration. The importance of the above-mentioned ECJ preliminary rulings judgments is primordial for the Polish and European lawyers, all the more so as the Brussels Ibis ('Recast') Regulation No. 1215/2012 is set to apply as from January 2015, which naturally gives rise to the question of validity of the previous case law on the original Regulation No. 44/2001 under its amended and reviewed version. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
4

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2013–2014) – rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1206/2001

63%
Pilich M., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2015
|
vol. 24
|
issue 4
933-974
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The law of international civil procedure thus remains one of the most vividly developing spheres of the European integration. The article contains the overall review of the ECJ acquis in the field of the EU international family law and several other instruments of the international civil procedure, incl. the Regulation for the European Enforcement Order, the European Payment Order, the Cross-Border Insolvency, and the Evidence Regulations. The motives of the ECJ judgments are confronted systematically with the scholarly elaborations, often critical about various aspects of the Court’s legal reasoning. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
5

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

51%
Pilich M., Rylski P., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3
649-765
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
6

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

51%
Pilich M., Rylski P., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 4
913-993
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.