Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

DANGLING PARTICIPLE CONSTRUCTION

100%
Kacala J.
Slovenská reč (Slovak Language)
|
2007
|
vol. 72
|
issue 4
193-203
EN
The author analyses an idea and term of dangling (absolute) participle construction, which means in Slovak grammatical tradition connection of participle with its adjuncts. He finds out that the term dangling participle construction is used to name different syntactic phenomenon: in addition to the real dangling participle constructions, that acquire parenthetic character in the sentence. This term is used also in connection with original participle forms, that came after transposition under secondary prepositions and adverbs or (seldom) under particles. But the real dangling participle constructions are only those, whose essential word has preserved validity of verbal form.
2

DANGLING PARTICIPLE CONSTRUCTION. II. DANGLING PARTICIPLE CONSTRUCTION AS A PARENTHESIS

100%
Kacala J.
Slovenská reč (Slovak Language)
|
2008
|
vol. 73
|
issue 1
15-29
EN
In connection to the first part of author's essay on dangling participle construction that was published in Slovenska rec, 2007, vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 193 - 203, second part is focused on the following four themes: 1. participle and participle construction, 2. non-normative participle constructions, 3. dangling or absolute participle constructions, 4. former forms of participle in validity of other word classes. The main effort is aimed at the analysis of actual dangling and absolute participle constructions within the frame of foundational sentence obtaining status of parenthesis or parenthetic construction.
3

NEUTRUM AS A SIGNAL OF NON-CONGRUENCE OF SYNTACTIC UNITS IN THE SYNTAGM

100%
Kacala J.
Slovenská reč (Slovak Language)
|
2005
|
vol. 70
|
issue 4
211-222
EN
The author introduces the subject of neutrum in three dimensions: (1) paradigmatic, (2) syntagmatic, (3) paradigmatico-syntagmatic. 1. Upon paradigmatic dimension of neutrum we mean its systemic placement in the structure of three partial members of grammatical category of gender. 2. Syntagmatic dimension of neutrum we understand as an application of neutrum in the construction process of the certain types of syntactic structures. 3. Paradigmatico-syntagmatic dimension signifies not only application of neutrum in the syntactic structures, but also its inevitable clustering in charging this syntagmatic dimension together with members of other grammatical categories, specifically with the 3rd person within the grammatical category of person and with the form of singular as a member of grammatical category of number.
4

RELATIONS OF THE SLOVAK AND CZECH LANGUAGE IN 20th CENTURY

100%
Kacala J.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2005
|
vol. 40
|
issue 2
158-166
EN
Based on the critical analyses of monographic work written by Wroclaw's slavist Jaroslaw Lipowski named 'Convergence and divergence of Czech and Slovak languages in Czechoslovakia' (Wroclaw, 2005) the author writes about the relations of Slovak and Czech language in 20th century. The traditional slavistic question is treated on the background of the generally accepted knowledge that Slovak and Czech are two structurally and genetically different but close Slavonic languages. In exploration of the subject matter author pays special attention to methodological questions. .
5

SLOVAK LINGUIST IN EXILE. THE WORK OF HENRICH BARTEK WRITTEN IN EXILE (1907-1986)

100%
Kacala J.
Slovenská reč (Slovak Language)
|
2007
|
vol. 72
|
issue 3
150-160
EN
The author deals with works of Henrich Bartek on Slovak language that were written in Bartek's exile after 1945. Special attention is paid to the analysis of Bartek's work 'Novy pravopis slovensky' (New Slovak Orthography) written in 1954 in response to the publication of the new Slovak Orthography (Pravidla slovenskeho pravopisu) in 1953. The author of this paper evaluates Bartek's linguistic work in a wider cultural and political context of the second third of 20th century.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.