Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Pozycja ustrojowa prezydenta w konstytucjach Litwy z 1922, 1928 i 1992 r.

100%
Malužinas M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2022
|
issue 4(171)
217–228
EN
The aim of this article is to compare the political position of the president in the parliamentary and authoritarian system of interwar Lithuania and the semi-presidential system of contemporary Lithuania. The analysis covers the regulations of three Lithuanian constitutions – those of 1922, 1928 and 1992. Such a strategy seems to be of great cognitive value, as it allows to show the differences and similarities, as well as the evolution of the role of the President in different periods of the Republic of Lithuania. The article assesses the most important legal provisions concerning the political position of the Head of State. The subject under study is still relevant, since Lithuania, as in the period of its first independence until 1926, adopted the same political system, restoring its pre-war solutions (including reactivating the institution of the Head of State). Both the current semi-presidential model of the Second Republic of Lithuania and the parliamentary model of the First Republic of Lithuania until 1926 represent the same type of democracy as a parliamentary system (with the superior role of the Sejm in the system of power).
2
Content available remote

Ewolucja pozycji ustrojowej Prezydenta w konstytucjach Litwy w okresie międzywojennym

100%
Malužinas M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2021
|
issue 2(163)
83–103
EN
This article is focused on the evolution of the constitutional position of the President of Lithuania in the Lithuanian Basic Laws. The analysis concerns the regulations of the three Lithuanian Basic Laws of the interwar period (of 1922, 1928 and 1938), two of which were an attempt to legitimize the political situation after the coup d’état against the constitutional government of the Republic of Lithuania in 1926 and also to implement the authoritarian government of President Antanas Smetona. The article also assesses the most important legal provisions concerning the constitutional position of the President, as well as compares the Lithuanian constitutional provisions with constitutions of other countries, primarily with the Polish Constitution of 1935. The research goals have been achieved thanks to the applied research methods, especially the comparative method, supplemented with the historical method and the method of institutional and legal analysis, which is used to analyse normative acts elaborated by legal bodies.
3
Content available remote

Pozycja prawna Centralnej Komisji Wyborczej Republiki Litewskiej

63%
Pyrzyńska A., Malužinas M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2023
|
issue 6(179)
85-107
EN
The aim of the paper is to analyse the legal position of the Central Electoral Commission in the electoral law of the Republic of Lithuania. The considerations focus, firstly, on defining the status of this body, and secondly, on identifying the tasks imposed by the legislator on the CEC. In the second case, the analysis focuses only on the general outline of the Commission’s tasks, as their detailed analysis would require the preparation of a separate study. The analysis also aimes at verifying whether the Lithuanian legislator, when shaping the regulations concerning the Commission, took into account the European standards for the organisation and functioning of central electoral bodies, as defined by the Venice Commission. On the basis of the conducted research work, an attempt was made to determine to which of the electoral administration models the Lithuanian model should be included, taking into account the location and tasks of the CEC. It should be added that the analysis of the above issues seems justified, as so far this issue has not been comprehensively discussed in the Polish legal or political science literature, and moreover, it has rarely been discussed in the Lithuanian literature. In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the formal and legal method was used and the doctrinal work was analysed. In addition, a comparative legal method was used to show the differences and similarities between the central authorities of other countries, and an empirical method was used to outline the practical aspects of the functioning of the CEC.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.