Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Zwrot korzyści majątkowej uzyskanej z przestępstwa skarbowego innej osoby w k.k.s.

100%
Czwojda A.
Nowa kodyfikacja prawa karnego
|
2015
|
vol. 35
73 - 84
PL
The article presents the problem of reimbursement of financial benefit derived from a tax offense of another person in the Fiscal Penal Code. It examines the conditions for the application of financial benefits return in the Fiscal Penal Code but alsocomparison with the regulation included in the Penal Code. The article takes into account positive developments as well as contains criticism relating to certain solutions. As aresult, presented considerations point to the need to fill the normative gaps in such away that the forfeiture of financial benefits could be arational instrument of a fiscal penal policy.
2
Content available remote

Instytucja przepadku korzyści majątkowej w kodeksie karnym skarbowym

100%
Czwojda A.
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
|
2015
|
vol. XIII
|
issue 3
65-82
EN
The article presents the problem of confiscation or forfeiture of property under the Tax Penal Code. It contains an analysis of the premises for application of forfeiture of financial benefits and the changes that concerned them. Particular attention was paid to the essence of the institution operating on the basis of the Tax Penal Code, comparing it to the relevant regulations of the Penal Code. The principles behind the application of this penal measure were indicated and the subjective scope of its application was discussed. Also the standpoint which takes into account the positive developments was presented, as well as criticisms relating to certain solutions. As a result, the conducted considerations pointed to the need to fill in the normative gaps in such a way that the forfeiture of financial benefits could be used as a rational instrument of fiscal penal policy.
3
Content available remote

Ewolucja regulacji prawnych dotyczących przepadku korzyści majątkowej uzyskanej z przestępstwa

100%
Czwojda A.
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
|
2014
|
vol. XII
|
issue 1
37-49
EN
The article deals with the evolution of legal regulations regarding the forfeiture of material benefits obtained from crime. It contains an analysis of the preconditions for application of forfeiture of such material benefits and changes related to them. Particular attention was paid to the amendment of Art. 45 of the Penal Code. The author presents an approach taking into account positive changes and provides critical comments concerning some of the solutions. As a result, the considerations indicate a need for complementing the regulatory deficiencies, in such a way as to make forfeiture of material gains represent a rational instrument of the penal policy.
4
Content available remote

Konkurencyjność przepadku przedmiotów a przepadku korzyści majątkowej

100%
Czwojda A.
Przegląd Prawa i Administracji
|
2013
|
vol. 93
105 - 119
EN
The article contains the legal regulations regarding the forfeiture of objects and gains originating from crimes. It contains an analysis of the conditions for the application of forfeiture and the changes related to them. Particular attention was given to the competition between different types of forfeiture. The article presents an approach taking into account the positive changes and provides critical comments concerning some of the solutions. As a result, the considerations indicate the need of delimitation of forfeiture of objects and gains, complementing the regulatory deficiencies.
5

Obowiązek zwrotu korzyści majątkowej uzyskanej z przestępstwa popełnionego przez inną osobę

100%
Czwojda A.
Nowa kodyfikacja prawa karnego
|
2013
|
vol. 30
29 - 44
EN
The article deals with the evolution of legal regulations regarding the reimbursement of proceeds from crime by a person other than the perpetrator. The author analyses the premises for applying the principle of forfeiture of proceeds and chances relating to them, paying particular attention to the nature of Article 52 of the Criminal Code. The analysis also takes into account the positive direction of the changes and contains critical remarks concerning some solutions. The conclusion indicates a need for eliminating regulatory shortcomings, thus making it possible for the principle of forfeiture of proceeds to be a rational instrument of penal policy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.