Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Deconstruction. Critical Interventions for the 21st Century and Beyond

100%
Gunkel D. J.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2022
|
vol. 58
|
issue 2
89-108
EN
This essay seeks to make a case for deconstruction as a kind of critical intervention for responding to and dealing with the opportunities and challenges of the 21st century and beyond. Toward this end, it proceeds in three steps or movements. (1) The first part will deconstruct deconstruction, deliberately employing what will be revealed as an inaccurate vernacular understanding of the term in order to extract a more precise and technical characterization of the concept. (2) The second part will investigate the constitutive elements of deconstruction, focusing attention on its two-step procedure, which has been deliberately designed to be a kind of distortion of Hegelian dialectics. (3) Finally, the third part will examine the opportunities and the challenges of the theory and practice of deconstruction indicating how and why it can be considered a critical intervention, albeit one that is not without its own potential problems and vulnerabilities.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Around "Deconstruction." Author’s Response

100%
Gunkel D. J.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2023
|
vol. 59
|
issue 2
7-20
EN
In this paper I reply to the four critical articles that were provided in response to my book Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). It proceeds in four steps: (1) I begin with a reply to Stanisław Chankowski’s use of the psychoanalytic term “fetishistic denial” to describe the formal character of the text. (2) I then engage with the criticism supplied by Piotr Kozak, who questions deconstruction’s theory of truth (or its lack thereof). (3) From this, I take-up and respond to Przemysław Nowakowski’s proposal that deconstruction might provide a way to reimagine the interdisciplinarity of cognitive science. And (4) I conclude with a response to Michał Piekarski’s mashup of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Jacques Derrida, which supplies a reading of these two thinkers that is arguably greater than the sum of the parts. The objective of the reply is not to offer a defense of myself or my text but to engage with these interesting and insightful reviews in a way that opens the space for productive dialogue.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Virtual Subjectivities: A Review of Stefano Gualeni and Daniel Vella’s Virtual Existentialism [Stefano Gualeni and Daniel Vella, Virtual Existentialism: Meaning and Subjectivity in Virtual Worlds, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020]

100%
Gunkel D. J.
Przegląd Kulturoznawczy
|
2020
|
issue 4 (46) Co po kryzysach? Kulturowe artykulacje przyszłości miast
493-497
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.