Władysław Tatarkiewicz (1886–1980) was a versatile scholar, active and fertile in a number of fields: Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Ethics, Aesthetics, and also History of Architecture. Before World War One, Tatarkiewicz studied Philosophy in Berlin and in Marbourg with H. Cohen and P. Natorp. After the Great War, he was nominated Professor of Philosophy at the newly reorganized Warsaw University. In the area of History of Philosophy, his key accomplishments included his studies of Polish philosophical thought, and also a history of European philosophy before 1830, which he published in two volumes entitled ‘History of Philosophy’. After World War Two, Tatarkiewicz expanded the scope of the work to include 19t century and contemporary philosophy, publishing the third volume of his History in 1948. Tatarkiewicz’s History of Philosophy became very popular with readers, and saw no less than twenty four editions until 2004. There were a number of reasons for this popularity. One of Tatarkiewicz’s important tasks was the standardization of philosophical terminology in the Polish language and he succeeded admirably. The elegance of his writing style, clarity and order in the exposition of issues and concepts, made his work exceptionally useful for teaching; Tatarkiewicz provided his readers with an orderly picture of history of philosophy and motivated them for further studies. To his merit, Tatarkiewicz also included discussion of important results of the medieval philosophy in Poland. Another important facet contributing to the long-lasting popularity of his oeuvre were the ideological conditions that reigned in Poland after World War Two, a time marked by a promoting of different philosophical language and new research methods. In the paper, the author presents a critical assessment of the contemporary value of Tatarkiewicz’s magnum opus. Even though History has become over the years a monument to crisp style and clear exposition, the work shows its age, as its scope corresponds to the state of research in the 1920’s (in the first two volumes) and in the late 1940’s (in the third volume). In view of this, the author calls for starting a collective and (no doubt multi-year) effort on a new history of philosophy in Polish language, work that would include the research in the field since 1945.
This Polish translation of the letter Francesco PETRARCH’S [from familiaris IV, 1] prepared for his summit of Mont Ventoux in Provence, which according to the Poet took place in April 1336, ist accessible in recent years in two critical editions of this letter: Vittorio Rossi in 1968 and last Petrarch’s Ascent of Mont Ventoux, The Familiaris IV, 1, by Rodney Lokaj. Roma 2006. The last edition was used as the basis for polish translations and commentaries. Paper consists of several parts, the first reconstructs the first period of biography to his first stay in Rome. In the following sections, the author considers the arguments in favor of postponing the date of the final emergence of this letter for the period 1352–3, and sets out its main ideas by paying attention to the fact that the Petrarch undertook the trip from aesthetic reasons, in search of beautiful landscapes and views. From this part of its deliberations have not been further recognized by historians of Renaissance aesthetics. Another important element is the impact on Augustine’s Confessions spiritual transformation that took place during the summit and acquire the same acquisition has been presented as an allegory of human life.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.