Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Autor wskazuje, że narody, państwa Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz Południowej połączyły wspólne wyznawane celu i wartości, które po upadku Związku Socjalistycznych Republik Radzieckich połączyły się w dążeniach do przystąpienia do Rady Europy i Unii Europejskiej. Państwa te korzystały z doradztwa w sprawach związanych z prawem konstytucyjnym organów Rady Europy i Unii Europejskiej. Z dużą starannością twórcy konstytucji wykorzystali poszczególne postanowienia Konwencji Europejskiej Praw Człowieka i Obywatela, co jest zresztą zjawiskiem występującym w nowych demokracjach. Podstawowe prawa, wolności i obowiązki obywateli są sformułowane w sposób wolny od obciążeń poprzedniego okresu historycznego. W procesie przeobrażeń każdego z tych państw zasadniczą rolę odgrywają: kultura polityczna społeczeństwa, świadomość prawna, reprezentowane wartości i sposoby myślenia. Od tego, na ile poważnie traktowane są wartości, zależy szybkość zmian jakości życia osoby i wspólnot.
EN
The author points out that the nations, countries of Central and Eastern and Southern Europe share a common goal and values, which after the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, have joined together in their efforts to join the Council of Europe and the European Union. These countries have been consulted on the constitutional law of the Council of Europe and European Union bodies. With great care, the creators of the Constitution used the individual provisions of the European Convention on Human and Citizen’s Rights, which is a phenomenon occurring in the new democracies. The fundamental rights, freedoms and duties of citizens are formulated in a way that is free from the burdens of the previous historical period. The political culture of society, legal awareness, values and ways of thinking have a fundamental role in the transformation of each of these countries. The rate of change in the quality of life of a person and a community depends on how seriously values are taken into account.
EN
Human life happens in a daily interaction space of symbolic interactions and communication dialogue, in which individuals produce specific practices and come into contact with social structures materialized in the daily activities. The article aims to show the value of dialogue as a unique tool of democratic creation of future filled with peace, respect for others, solidarity, kindness and hope. The addition to the term “dialogue” of the adjective term “social” means that the perspective, at which it is targeted, is not individual, but covers the society as a whole. The dialogue itself is understood as conversation, an exchange of views, which can lead to achievement of common compromise and aiming at common goals. For direct expression of the will of the nation or its communities forms of direct democracy are used. The principle of dialogue presented in the article refers to both the sphere of domestic and international law, including the law of EU.
PL
Artykuł nie zawiera abstraktu w języku polskim
EN
The author undertakes to establish the legal title to performing the creative function by the two chambers of Polish Parliament as a representative of the nation. The article describes the competence of the Sejm and the Senate as the constitutional authorities of the State that perform the creative function. The creative function of the Parliament may be considered as a result of the activities of this institution for other institutions as well as the functioning of the whole system. Voters’ crisis of confidence in the both chambers of Polish Parliament may also be understood as a crisis of its functions.
4
100%
PL
The author considers the questions relating to the formation of lawyers’ professional traits from the point of view of the significance which human capital and investment in this capital hold in contemporary times. It follows from the analyses, which were carried out, that the dire need for taking up actions with the aim to shape lawyers appears one of the most vital tasks. This requires taking into account visible trends in the changing job market. Another aspect results from the need for multilevel qualifications and conditions behind lawyers’ actions and their decisions. Thus, colleges of higher education which educate prospective lawyers, as well as lawyers’ corporations, are confronted by challenges of forming, in young people, features that are indispensable for them to be valuable lawyers and not only executors of simple activities. The author points to the fact that lawyers need shaping because, among others, during their whole social lives and realization of professional tasks their personality traits and potential related to communication will constantly manifest through accepting and following or rejecting and opposing values, principles, reflexions, empathy, sensitivity, the farthest-fetched imagination, objectivism, cooperation, dialogue, distancing themselves from political disputes, etc. Students of the art of law should be characterized by a changed mentality, new vision of law – service to man, and realization of standards of law, as well as perception of the importance of knowledge, skills, attitudes and competences.
EN
The author draws attention to the consideration of the complexity of civil participation in deliberative democracy, indicating that the legislator assumed that dialogue is to be a way of existence, and thus the basis of any social situation in the state. State authorities appointed to serve the people and the common good have to ask citizens about their position in the case, not in order to obtain the desired response, thus emphasizing the departure from the monologue culture in favor of dialogue and communication with the public. The author claims that the normative foundations of the community state are linked by the conviction that public values and purposes are established in the communication process. In this approach, it is important to achieve public purposes and the quality of their achievement, its constructive features are: network, multi-level management, conciliation, participation. The basic mechanisms of action of this type of state are: deliberation, compromise and arrangements are made in the social networks – the dominant type of management of public affairs in this model is co-management. Solicitude of the state as a common good obliges not only a citizen, but means that a citizen has the right to expect that public authority will act so that the Republic of Poland can be considered a common good by citizens. Referring to literature, the author notes that deliberative democracy and its concept put more emphasis on the importance of conversation, discussion and debate on democratic practice than on the importance of voting. Its supporters argue that the debate improves the quality of collective decisions and increases the chances of their acceptance. Varieties of deliberative democracy range from accentuating local representation to reinforcing the debate within representative legislative bodies. The article points out the differences between discourse and deliberation. Moreover, the forms of civic participation and civic participation techniques used in Poland are presented. We have come to live in times when communication, both traditional and with the help of modern media, plays a significant role in shaping societies. It is important to understand the basic laws guiding communication, the ability to properly form interpersonal relationships, cognize the factors affecting the quality of messages transmitted, the technique of freedom of expression, the skill of persuasion and argumentation. The correct perception of the essence of dialogue in a deliberative democracy is its foundation, especially when it concerns institutions aimed at turning natural and legal persons to public decision-making process. Considering the literature, it was found that new participative solutions, primarily the ability to dialogue, could prevent a democratic deficit and also indicated that that civic participation impacts on the creation of deliberative democracy.
EN
The Author points to the necessity of a new perspective on family law in the axiological aspect, application of the law, realization of family rights and rights in the family in the changing reality. He draws attention to the changing approach to personal family law over time and that the world full of progress, threats, failures of authorities translates into understanding man and family. At the same time, it is pointed out that the time that has elapsed since the codification of family law (in a different legal system) and its numerous amendments oblige to take up this issue and the need to separate family law, the task of which would be a protective function (as indicated by the constitutional protection of the family). The author raises the need to approach law against the background of the concept of a person and as obligatory interpersonal relations, recognizing that such a philosophical perspective broadens too narrow paradigm of positivist understanding of statutory law and as a result, there are lack of tools to apprehend the essence of the law and explain them. It is emphasized that the system of values determined the choice of goals and methods of achieving them contained in the project of the Family Code, proposing a system of concepts and ideas using common and scientific knowledge, and, consequently, adopting the personal character of a human being.
PL
Autor wskazuje na konieczność nowego spojrzenia na prawo rodzinne w aspekcie aksjologicznym, stosowania prawa, urzeczywistniania praw rodziny i praw w rodzinie w zmieniającej się rzeczywistości. Zwraca uwagę na zmieniające się podejście na przestrzeni czasu do osobowego prawa rodzinnego oraz że świat pełen postępu i zagrożeń, upadków autorytetów przekłada się na rozumienie człowieka i rodziny. Jednocześnie wskazuje, iż czas, jaki upłynął od kodyfikacji prawa rodzinnego (w innym systemie prawnym) i liczne jego nowelizacje obligują do podjęcia tej problematyki i potrzeby wyodrębnienie prawa rodzinnego, którego zadaniem byłaby funkcja ochronna (na co wskazuje konstytucyjna ochrona rodziny). Podnosi potrzebę sięgnięcia do ujęcia prawa na tle koncepcji osoby i jako powinnościowych relacji międzyosobowych uznając, że taka filozoficzna perspektywa poszerza zbyt wąski paradygmat pozytywistycznego pojmowania prawa stanowionego i na skutek tego brak jest narzędzi do ujęcia istoty prawa i ich wyjaśniania. Podkreśla, że system wartości zdeterminował zawarty w projekcie Kodeksu rodzinnego wybór celów i sposobów ich osiągnięcia, proponuje system pojęć i idei z wykorzystaniem wiedzy potocznej oraz naukowej, a w konsekwencji przyjęcie osobowego charakteru człowieka.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.