In the article, Milosz’s poem Campo di Fiori and Brodsky’s cycle The Roman Elegies arecompared in the aspect of the interpretation of the role of culture and poetic word in the existentialself-identification of the person and the poet. Through the analysis of Rome’s image in the lyricplot, the author of the article compares the worldview of the poets and their conception of the roleof poetry in history and in being. The second part of the article interprets the direct dialogue ofcontemporary Russian poets (Alexei Makushinskii, Gleb Shulpyakov, Ivan Barkov) with Milosz,that offered new variants of the Polish poet’s lyric collision.
The article reveals the picture of the world in poetry L. Martynov, to identify the concept of man as a demiurge-generation of evolution of space development as a tool of self-nature. The article accented the originality of the poetic philosophy and its proximity leading natural-philosophical and cultural concepts in the philosophy of the twentieth century: а noosphere idea in the philosophy of Russian cosmists, a sinergetics development model and the ecophilosophy the second half of the twentieth century. It installed here stability and correction of natural philosophy and anthropology of Martynov in his poetry from the 1920s to the 1970s.
The article explores the change of the representation of the Russian and the Pole’s encounter and love as the metaphor of the social, national and existential choice.The author reveals how the conception of man and the picture of the world changes on the example of the Russian Prose of the second half of the XXth Century (V. Bogomolov’s Zosia, L. Zorin’s The Warsaw’s Melody, E. Radzinski’s Lunin, or Jack’s Death, B. Okudzhava’s The Travel o f Dilettanti, A. Utkin’s Round Dance (Khorovod), J. Bujda’s Boris and Gleb).
The article explores the metatextual structure, subject organization, and the plot in the novel of the modern Russian writer Vladislav Otroshenko called The Person beyond Authenticity. The subject of the research is the mystification of textual reality as the author’s strategy and the story line that allows the writer to pose a problem of the correlation of reality and the text in the works of art. The aesthetics of Otroshenko is found to be borderline: it combines the modernist mystification of the text as manifestation of the mystery of Being and postmodernist demystification of the text as the play of signs.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.