Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

On the concept of figurations, deep mediatization, and the adulthood of media and communication studies – the interview with Andreas Hepp

100%
Nowak J.
Mediatization Studies
|
2017
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
EN
Andreas Hepp is Professor of Communication and Media Studies at ZeMKI, Centre for Media, Communication and Information Research at theUniversityofBremen. Mediatization research is among his various research interests that generally include media and communication theory, media sociology, and transcultural communication. Theoretical and empirical studies on mediatization processes are also among the leading subjects in the academic work of ZeMKI.Andreas Hepp is the author of several publications on the subject of mediatization, including his latest book The Mediated Construction of Reality written with Nick Couldry of the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science. In The Mediated Construction of Reality, Couldry and Hepp revisit the question of how the social world is constructed, originally asked by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann (1966), and provide the reader with their own original answer, acknowledging the complex and irreducible contribution of digital media to the process. The editorial staff of Mediatization Studies reckons Andreas Hepp as one of the leading academics in the field of mediatization research and his and Couldry’s book as one of the most interesting and up-to-date accounts on the issue. This is why we decided to present it via this interview.The interview was conducted during the Communicative Figurations international conference in Bremen (December 7-9, 2016), which focused on transforming communications in times of deep mediatization. Couldry and Hepp’s book had its official presentation during the conference.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

On the concept of figurations, deep mediatization, and the adulthood of media and communication studies – the interview with Andreas Hepp

100%
Nowak J.
Mediatization Studies
|
2017
|
vol. 1
EN
Andreas Hepp is Professor of Communication and Media Studies at ZeMKI, Centre for Media, Communication and Information Research at theUniversityofBremen. Mediatization research is among his various research interests that generally include media and communication theory, media sociology, and transcultural communication. Theoretical and empirical studies on mediatization processes are also among the leading subjects in the academic work of ZeMKI.Andreas Hepp is the author of several publications on the subject of mediatization, including his latest book The Mediated Construction of Reality written with Nick Couldry of the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science. In The Mediated Construction of Reality, Couldry and Hepp revisit the question of how the social world is constructed, originally asked by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann (1966), and provide the reader with their own original answer, acknowledging the complex and irreducible contribution of digital media to the process. The editorial staff of Mediatization Studies reckons Andreas Hepp as one of the leading academics in the field of mediatization research and his and Couldry’s book as one of the most interesting and up-to-date accounts on the issue. This is why we decided to present it via this interview.The interview was conducted during the Communicative Figurations international conference in Bremen (December 7-9, 2016), which focused on transforming communications in times of deep mediatization. Couldry and Hepp’s book had its official presentation during the conference.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Memowe wojny, artykulacja i Stuart Hall. O strukturalnych uwarunkowaniach sieciowej popkultury

100%
Nowak J.
Przegląd Kulturoznawczy
|
2017
|
issue 2 (32)
207-222
EN
Theoretically departing from Stuart Hall’s theory of articulation, the article analyzes structural conditions of popular culture online. New media are tools and spaces for people’s engagement in various interpretive communities, also consisting of services offered by neoliberal market agents. The article deconstructs the status of these so-called “internets” being both: pop-cultural and civic resource. Popular culture online is nowadays entangled in a curious dialectics between more active communities of its audiences-participants and increasingly powerful digital culture industry. It is also a sphere of processes of articulation understood after Stuart Hall as expressing particular discursive positions (alternative to the official criteria of interpreting the reality), and as connection – here of spheres of people’s meaningful practices and (naturalized) sphere of the market.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Surveillance and privacy as emerging issues in communication and media studies. An introduction

63%
Möller J. E., Nowak J.
Mediatization Studies
|
2018
|
vol. 2
EN
Balleys C., Coll S. (2017). Being publicly intimate: Teenagers managing online privacy. Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 39(6), pp. 885–901.Bond R. M., Fariss C. J., Jones J. J., Kramer A. D. I., Marlow C., Settle J. E., Fowler J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization, Nature, Vol. 489, pp. 295–298.Dencik L., Jansen F., Metcalfe, P. (2018). A conceptual framework for approaching social justice in an age of datafication, DATAJUSTICE project, https://datajusticeproject.net/2018/08/30/aconceptual-framework-for-approaching-social-justice-in-an-age-of-datafication/, 01.02.2019.Fuchs C. (2011). The Political Economy of Privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, Vol. 13(2), pp. 139–159.Helmond A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, Vol. 1(2), pp. 1–11.Hillygus D. S., Shields T. G. (2009). The Persuadable Voter. Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Hintz A., Dencik L., Wahl-Jorgensen K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press: Medford.Kramp L., Loosen W. (2017). The transformation of journalism: from changing newsroom cultures to a new communicative orientation? In A. Hepp, U. Hasebrink, A. Breiter (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Rethinking mediatized transformations, Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke. pp. 205–239.Kruschinski. S., Haller A. (2017). Restrictions on data-driven political micro-targeting in Germany. Internet Policy Review, Vol. 6(4), pp. 1–23.Kunelius R., Heikkilä H., Russell A., Yagodin D. (Eds.). (2017). Journalism and the NSA Revelations:Privacy, security, and the press. I.B. Tauris: London.Livingstone S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, Vol. 10(3), 393–411.Lokot T. (2018). Be Safe or Be Seen? How Russian Activists Negotiate Visibility and Security in Online Resistance Practices. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 16 (3), 332–346.Loosen W., Reimer J.; De Silva-Schmidt F. (2017). Data-Driven Reporting – an On-Going (R) Evolution? A Longitudinal Analysis of Projects Nominated for the Data Journalism Awards 2013–2015. Working Paper Series Hans-Bredow-Institut No. 41.Lyon D. (2002). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life (Repr). Issues in society. Open Uniersity Press: Buckingham.Marwick A. E., boyd d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, Vol. 16(7), pp. 1051–1067.Möller J., von Rimscha M. B. (2017). (De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem. Media and Communication, Vol. 5(3), pp. 37–48.Nissenbaum H. (2004): Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, Vol. 79(1), pp. 101–139.Nissenbaum H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books: Stanford.Nowak J., Möller J. E. (2018, November). Don’t hate the media. Act on media., Paper presented at the 7th ECREA Conference, Lugano, Switzerland.Sifry M. Facebook Wants You to Vote on Tuesday. Here’s How It Messed With Your Feed in 2012, Mother Jones, http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/10/can-voting-facebook-button-improve-voter-turnout, 31.10.2018.Trepte S. (2016). The paradoxes of online privacy. In M. Walrave, K. Ponnet, E. Vanderhoven, J. Haers, B. Segaert (Eds.), Youth 2.0: Social media and adolescence. Connecting, Sharing and Empowering, Springer International Publishing: Cham, pp. 103–115.Trepte S., Reinecke L., Ellison N. B., Quiring O., Yao M. Z., Ziegele M. (2017). A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Privacy Calculus. Social Media + Society, Vol. 3(1), pp. 1–13.Von Pape T., Trepte S., Mothes C. (2017). Privacy by disaster? Press coverage of privacy and digital technology. European Journal of Communication, Vol. 32(3), pp. 189–207.Wahl-Jorgensen K. (2017). A manifesto of failure for digital journalism. In P. J. Boczkowski, C. W. Anderson (Eds.), Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age, Inside Technology, MIT Press, Cambrdige MA, pp. 251–266.Wahl-Jorgensen K., Bennett L., Taylor G. (2017). The normalization of surveillance and the invisibility of digital citizenship: Media debates after the Snowden revelations. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 11, pp. 740–762.Westin A. F. (2015). Privacy and Freedom. IG Publishing: New York.Whittaker Z. Facebook won’t let you opt out of its phone number ‘look up’ setting, Techcrunch, https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/03/facebook-phone-number-look-up/?guccounter=1&-guce_referrer_us=aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXR6cG9saXRpay5vcmcvMjAxOS9mYWNlYm9vay-1taXNzYnJhdWNodC1oYW5keW51bW1lcm4tenUtd2VyYmV6d2Vja2VuLw&guce_referrer_cs=qtabV8dO1eMJbuNvjSOyJQ, 03.03.2019.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Reviews

63%
Yingfa S., Nowak J.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia
|
2014
|
vol. 21
|
issue 1
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Doing Privacy. Exploring the Limits of Self-Determination

63%
Nowak J., Möller J. E.
Central European Journal of Communication
|
2024
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4(38)
531-549
EN
Acknowledging the notoriously ‘incomplete’ nature of privacy has little effect on the considerable expectations the notion implies. Self-determined privacy points to reflexivity, critical practice and tech literacy. While privacy scholarship illustrates those points and explains how agents constantly fail in meeting these expectations, we ask the inverse question. What are the limits of privacy? Interviewing Polish and German activists who engage in privacy-conscious social and professional relations, this qualitative study strives to understand how self-determined privacy is realized. Focusing on how individuals shape their privacies as social agents, including the motivations and contexts of their practices, our insights serve as a case study highlighting the challenges of realizing the everyday endeavor of privacy in datafied environments.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Recenzje-sprawozdania

51%
Dawidowicz A., Nowak J., Cieciora M.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia
|
2014
|
vol. 21
|
issue 2
8

Reviews. Reports / Recenzje. Sprawozdania

39%
Nowak J., Stachyra G., Żęgota K., Łuszczuk M., Sienkiewicz M. W., Pawłowski K.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia
|
2012
|
vol. 19
|
issue 2
115-132
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.