This article polemicises with one thesis contained in Anna Burzynska's book 'Anty-teoria literatury' (Literary anti-theory), Universitas publishers, Kraków 2006. He analyses a deconstructive criticism of the literary communication model, coming to the conclusion that it is unjust to juxtapose a communicationist, passive theory of reading, enclosed by models, and a theory of active and open-ended reading. He emphasises that the principle of reading-related activism, as postulated by deconstructivists, constitutes broadened knowledge on literary communication, whilst not being a critical 'turn' that apodictically crosses out the issue's theoretical past.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.