Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W artykule omówiono warunki, założenia i cele reformy systemu emerytalnego wprowadzonej w 2001 r. w Polsce. Zwrócono uwagę na podstawowy aspekt koniecznych zmian: tendencje demograficzne polegające na wydłużaniu się życia ludzi i zmniejszaniu liczby urodzeń, co wpływa na achwianie proporcji między pracującymi (czyli wpłacającymi stosowne środki do systemu) i niepracującymi (korzystającymi z wypracowanych środków). Konsekwencją utrzymującego się zachwiania będzie załamanie systemu emerytalnego i brak środków na wypłaty lub znaczące obniżenie ich wielkości. W artykule omówiono również doświadczenia kilkunastu lat istnienia zreformowanego systemu emerytalnego i wskazano możliwe scenariusze rozwoju. Omówiono efekty i problemy przej-ścia od systemu repartycyjnego do trójfilarowego. Poruszono także zagadnienie ryzyka dla finansów publicznych związanego z przeniesieniem części bieżących składek z ZUS do OFE oraz z funkcjonowaniem dwóch systemów emerytalnych równocześnie. Podjęto próbę określenia wpływu OFE na wysokość przyszłych emerytur, nakreślono perspektywy społecznego systemu ubezpieczeń emerytalnych oraz ryzyko z tym związane.
EN
In his article, the author discussed the conditions, assumptions and objectives of the reform of the old-age pension system introduced in 2001 in Poland. He paid attention to the basic aspect of necessary changes: demographic trends consisting in extension of the lifespan of people and reduction of the number of births what affects upsetting the proportion between working (i.e. paying relevant contributions to the system) and non-working (using the funds worked out) people. A consequence of the persisting disturbance will be a collapse of the old-age pension system and lack of money for payments or a considerable reduction of their value. In the article, the author also discussed the experience of more than ten years of existence of the reformed old-age pension system and indicated the possible scenarios of development. He discussed the effects and problems of the shift of the pay-as-you-go system to the three-pillar one. He also touched the issue of the risk for public finance related to the transfer of part of the current contributions from the Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) to the Open Pension Fund (OFE) as well as to functioning of the two old-age pension system concurrently. He undertook an attempt to determine the impact of OFE on the amount of future pensions, outlined the perspectives of the social system of old-age pension insurance and the risk related thereto.
EN
The aim of this paper is to present Polish pre-war literature on Nazi economic policy and to compare Leopold Caro’s views with analyses of a well-known postwar economist, Paweł Sulmicki, presented in his doctoral thesis of 1946. The comparison of these two interpretations enables the authors to show not only the change of views on the totalitarian economy of Germany, but also the transformations that took place in the Polish theory of economics at that time. In terms of methodology, the work of Leopold Caro (published in 1938) did not go beyond what the German historical school offered. Paweł Sulmicki, on the other hand, explained the processes taking place in the German economy from the point of view of the theory of multiplier which was relatively new at that time. Sulmicki did not explicitly state that the phenomena analyzed by him were paradoxes in the light of Keynesian theory, but he described the factors that led to the success of the economic policy at a low level of the multiplier.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.