Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Wręczenie księgi pamiątkowej Profesorowi Tadeuszowi Erecińskiemu

100%
Rylski P.
Studia Iuridica
|
2014
|
vol. 59
385-387
2

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

58%
Rylski P., Weitz K., Wołodkiewicz B.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 3
705-799
EN
Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavouring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
3

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

58%
Pilich M., Rylski P., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3
649-765
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
4

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) — rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 861/2007, nr 650/2012, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

58%
Rylski, P., Weitz K., Wołodkiewicz B.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 4
941-1014
EN
Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of the European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they try not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
5

Przegląd orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2011-2012)

58%
Grzegorczyk P., Rylski P., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2013
|
vol. 22
|
issue 3
657-772
EN
In the introduction to the subject matter there is a draft of the status of binding provisions in the scope of European civil process law. Next it is subject to analysis the judicature concerning regulation 44/2001 (Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters). Particularly European Court of Justice judgments are discussed as to exemplify: - a scope of application of regulation mentioned above, - general questions concerning jurisdiction, - particular jurisdictions (matters concerning contracts, torts, forum conexitatis), - jurisdiction for consumer matters, - jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment, - exclusive jurisdictions, - recognition and enforcement. The study takes into consideration selected questions regarding to the following European Union legal acts: - regulation 2001/2003 (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, - regulation 805/2004 (Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims), - regulation 1896/2006 (Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure), - regulation 1346/2000 (Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings), - regulation 1393/2007 (Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000), - regulation 1206/2001 (Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters).
6

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

58%
Pilich M., Rylski P., Weitz K.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 4
913-993
EN
In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.