Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gloss to the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C 129/18, SM versus Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section

100%
Woch K.
Review of European and Comparative Law
|
2020
|
vol. 40
|
issue 1
189-200
EN
The right of family members of Union citizens to live with them in the host Member State has always been considered essential for an effective freedom of movement of citizens. However, the provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC contain a different description of the scope of rights of family members of Union citizens taking advantage of the freedom of movement of persons as to the possibility of accompanying or joining EU citizens taking advantage of the freedom of movement of persons, depending on whether they belong to the circle of ‘closer’ or ‘distant’ family members. This issue acquires particular significance in the context of family members who are not citizens of any Member State of the Union. For individuals belonging to the circle of ‘closer’ family members, the EU legislator grants the subjective right to accompany or join a Union citizen exercising the right of the freedom of movement of persons. In the latter case, the legislator only obliges the host Member States to facilitate entry and residence for such individuals in accordance with their national legislation. The glossed judgment, by determining the status of individuals under legal guardianship within the framework of the Algerian kafala system as a ‘distant’ family member of a Union citizen, clearly touches upon a significant issue in the context of the Union’s freedom of movement of persons.
PL
The right of family members of Union citizens to live with them in the host Member State has always been considered essential for an effective freedom of movement of citizens. However, the provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC contain a different description of the scope of rights of family members of Union citizens taking advantage of the freedom of movement of persons as to the possibility of accompanying or joining EU citizens taking advantage of the freedom of movement of persons, depending on whether they belong to the circle of ‘closer’ or ‘distant’ family members. This issue acquires particular significance in the context of family members who are not citizens of any Member State of the Union. For individuals belonging to the circle of ‘closer’ family members, the EU legislator grants the subjective right to accompany or join a Union citizen exercising the right of the freedom of movement of persons. In the latter case, the legislator only obliges the host Member States to facilitate entry and residence for such individuals in accordance with their national legislation. The glossed judgment, by determining the status of individuals under legal guardianship within the framework of the Algerian kafala system as a ‘distant’ family member of a Union citizen, clearly touches upon a significant issue in the context of the Union’s freedom of movement of persons.    
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

THE EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION - SELECTED SYSTEM-WIDE ISSUES AND ACTIVITIES

100%
Woch K.
Review of European and Comparative Law
|
2018
|
vol. 34
|
issue 3
41-57
PL
The issue of drugs is an important problem for the European citizens and it poses a serious threat to safety and health of the European society. This is mainly due to the fact that one of the basic features characterizing the problem of drugs is its changeable and dynamic nature. Furthermore, the drug-related phenomena haveno borders, they exist everywhere where people live and affect all social classes. The European Union is one of the international organizations which, both by its own activities and the efforts of the member states, attempts to prevent and fight the adverse effects associated with drug abuse. The implementation of such a goal is possible thanks to the activities of the agency responsible for the holistic study of the problem of drugs and drug addiction and for popularization of the obtained information among the EU institutions, Member States and other organizations. The purpose of the article is to present the activities of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, whose role is to provide factual, objective, reliable and comparable information of the European standard on drugs and drug addiction as well as their effects both on the European Union itself andthe member states.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 listopada 2019 r. III CZP 26/19

100%
Woch K.
Studia Prawnicze KUL
|
2020
|
issue 2
403-415
EN
In accordance with art. 788 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, evidence provided by the applicant plays a key role in obtaining an enforcement clause in favor of (against) the legal successor of the original creditor (debtor). The effective demonstration of the transfer of rights or obligations to the legal successor in this case is possible only on the basis of official documents or private documents with an officially certified signature. The judgment exhausts the judicial doubts that may arise when assessing a private document with a notarially authenticated signature (and thus one of the types of official signature confirmation) in the context of proof of transfer of rights (obligations) to the legal successor of the original creditor (debtor).
PL
W świetle dyspozycji art. 788 § 1 K.p.c. dowody przedstawione przez wnioskodawcę odgrywają kluczową rolę dla uzyskania klauzuli wykonalności na rzecz (przeciwko) następcy prawnego pierwotnego wierzyciela (dłużnika). Skuteczne wykazanie przejścia uprawnień lub obowiązków na rzecz następcy prawnego w tym przypadku możliwe jest wyłącznie na podstawie dokumentów urzędowych lub dokumentów prywatnych z podpisem urzędowo poświadczonym. Glosowane orzeczenie wyczerpuje wątpliwości orzecznicze, jakie mogą powstać przy ocenie dokumentu prywatnego z podpisem notarialnie poświadczonym (a zatem jednego z rodzajów urzędowego poświadczenia podpisu) w kontekście dowodu przejścia uprawnień (obowiązków) na następcę prawnego pierwotnego wierzyciela (dłużnika).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zawarcie małżeństwa cywilnego w formie wyznaniowej w sytuacji sporządzenia aktu małżeństwa z naruszeniem artykułu 8 Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego. Glosa aprobująca do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 maja 2023 roku (III CZP 71/22)

100%
Woch K.
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
|
2023
|
vol. 26
393-409
EN
The present commentary analyses the resolution of a panel of seven judges of the Polish Supreme Court of May 10, 2023 (III CZP 71/22). The Court stated that the criteria provided in Article 1 § 2 of the Family and Guardianship Code are of fundamental importance to assess whether a marriage governed by a church’s or other religious organization’s internal law produces the effects of marriage concluded in accordance with Polish law. This means that one of the sine qua non conditions of the conclusion of civil marriage in the religious form – despite the prevailing view on the declaratory nature of civil status records – is drawing up a marriage certificate. When assessing the aforementioned resolution, this paper considers whether it is possible to assign to civil status acts not only a declaratory nature but also, depending on the circumstances, a constitutive character. This paper also addresses the question of the mutual relationship between Articles 1 § 2 and 8 of the Family and Guardianship Code in the context of possibly questioning a civil marriage’s existence in situations wherein the registrar draws up a marriage certificate despite violations of the requirements in the latter provision – particularly when the clergyman has failed to meet the deadline defined in Article 8 § 3. The author approves of the view that the drawing up of the marriage certificate is a necessary condition for the conclusion of civil marriage in the religious form. The regulations under Article 8 of the Family and Guardianship Code should be treated as a special administrative procedure, the violation of which may lead to a refusal to draw up a marriage certificate. However, any shortcomings in this respect cannot in themselves result in the declaration of the nonexistence of a civil marriage.
PL
Glosa poddaje analizie uchwałę składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 maja 2023 r. (III CZP 71/22). Stwierdzono w niej, że dla oceny, czy związek małżeński podlegający prawu wewnętrznemu kościoła albo innego związku wyznaniowego wywołuje także skutki zawarcia małżeństwa zgodnie z prawem polskim, fundamentalne znaczenie mają kryteria określone w art. 1 § 2 k.r.o. Oznacza to, że jednym z warunków sine qua non, od którego ustawodawca uzależnia zawarcie małżeństwa cywilnego w formie wyznaniowej – pomimo przeważającego poglądu o deklaratoryjnym charakterze aktów stanu cywilnego – jest sporządzenie aktu małżeństwa. Dokonując oceny tytułowej uchwały, rozważono, czy możliwe jest przypisanie aktom stanu cywilnego nie tylko deklaratoryjnego, lecz także, w zależności od okoliczności, konstytutywnego charakteru. Podjęto się też odpowiedzi na pytanie o wzajemną relację pomiędzy art. 1 § 2 i art. 8 k.r.o. w kontekście możliwości zakwestionowania istnienia małżeństwa cywilnego, w sytuacji gdy kierownik urzędu stanu cywilnego sporządzi akt małżeństwa pomimo naruszenia wymogów, o których mowa w art. 8 k.r.o., w szczególności zaś uchybienia przez duchownego terminowi do przekazania zaświadczenia o złożeniu wobec niego wymaganych prawem oświadczeń woli. W wyniku przeprowadzonej analizy zaaprobowano pogląd, zgodnie z którym sporządzenie aktu małżeństwa jest warunkiem koniecznym zawarcia małżeństwa cywilnego w formie wyznaniowej. Regulacje z art. 8 k.r.o. należy traktować jako szczególną procedurę administracyjną, której naruszenie może prowadzić do odmowy sporządzenia aktu małżeństwa. Ewentualne uchybienia w tym zakresie nie mogą same w sobie skutkować ustaleniem nieistnienia małżeństwa.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.