Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Rocznik Tomistyczny

Authors help

  1. 2 Ćwiertniak T.

Years help

  1. 1 2020

  2. 1 2019

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

W poszukiwaniu źródłowego doświadczenia filozoficznego. Paralele pomiędzy fenomenologią i filozofią dialogu a współczesnym tomizmem egzystencjalnym

100%
Ćwiertniak T.
Rocznik Tomistyczny
|
2020
|
vol. 2
|
issue 9
115-132
EN
The aim of this article is to indicate certain ideas common to existential Thomism, Phenomenology, and the Philosophy of Dialogue. While the often polemical philosophical literature more frequently emphasizes the discrepancies between these philosophical schools, a closer look, which takes into account the current state of philosophy and its relationship to dynamically developing science (especially natural science), reveals several common elements. Despite their differences, manifested especially in their use of different conceptual apparatuses, all three philosophical schools point to the existence of primary, irreducible experiences that are inaccessible to science. These experiences indicate the primacy of the personal world over the naturalistic representation of the world (reality) that emerges from natural science.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Tomizm egzystencjalny Mieczysława A. Krąpca a tomizm konsekwentny Mieczysława Gogacza. Ku analizie porównawczej

100%
Ćwiertniak T.
Rocznik Tomistyczny
|
2019
|
vol. 8
173-195
EN
The aim of this article is to present the perspectives for a comparative analysis of the philosophical views of two renowned Polish representatives of existential Thomism. The authors mentioned above are known as the main representatives of the most important Polish Thomistic schools: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec is the most important representative of the Lublin School of Classical Philosophy, while Mieczysław Gogacz is the founder of the Warsaw School of Consequential Thomism. At the base of this article, meant as an introduction to more advanced analyses, lies the conviction that mutual isolation between philosophical schools is harmful. It shows the necessity of a reciprocal confrontation of research results. In this paper, following a short historical introduction, the Author first presents the main areas in the thought of the two philosophers, which – due to differences in the concepts they employ – are most in need of thorough comparative research. Afterwards, the Author points out the most important achievements of both philosophers and makes an outline of the main difficulties and aporias connected with their ideas. Finally, an outline of further research is presented, which could help to overcome the aporias demonstrated here.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.