Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

František Palacký a Theodor Mommsen. K paralele pomníků

100%
Fapšo M.
Střed. Časopis pro mezioborová studia Střední Evropy 19. a 20. století. / Centre. Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies of Central Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries.
|
2012
|
vol. 4
|
issue 1
9-32
EN
The article provides a comparison of two monuments - one of František Palacký in Prague and second of Theodor Mommsen in Berlin. Both men were key historians of their nations in 19th century. Palacký has offered a master-narrative of Czech national past in his famous book The History of Czech Nation in Bohemia and Moravia and set the main structures of narrating Czech history for two centuries. Theodor Mommsen has become a worldwide known historian due to his extraordinary History of Rome, for which he has obtained Nobel Price for Literature in 1903. Monuments of these historians were built on the beginning of the 20th century (Palacký's in 1912, Mommsen's in 1909). The paper focuses on structural similarities between the monuments, especially in the area of collective memory. Using theory of Maurice Halbwachs that was formulated just before World War II the essay points out that there is a fundamental connection between memory and space. The essay argues that there is no significant structural difference between Palacký's and Mommsen's monument in terms of shaping the collective memory.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Historiografie a politika v předválečném Československu (Pfitzner — Pekař). Diskusní příspěvek

100%
Fapšo M.
Historie – Otázky – Problémy (History, Issues, Problems)
|
2014
|
vol. 6
|
issue 1
157-165
EN
This study focuses on the ideological link between Czech and German historiography during the First Czechoslovak Republic. The general subject is exemplified by the case of Josef Pekař and Josef Pfitzner, who were high-profile representatives of the field at that time. The study also articulates the hidden presumptions behind both historiansʼ concepts of history, thus presenting a platform on which a nationally oriented exposition of the epoch can be surpassed and new research questions on the First Republic can be opened up within a broader framework.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.