Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Organization of the Judicial System in Post-War Poland

100%
Madera A.
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
|
2020
|
issue 6 (58)
307-316
EN
Independence of the judiciary is a fundamental value. It determines the quality of organization and work, as well as the role that judicature plays in a democratic country. Justice, based on the rule of law and constituting the highest value for the society, can be implemented only in the spirit of this independence. Any changes and modifications ought to strive for one goal - a strong, independent judicature. The paper introduces the reconstruction process of the Polish judiciary after World War II, outlining the problems and challenges that it had to face in that period.
PL
Niezależność i niezawisłość wymiaru sprawiedliwości to wartości fundamentalne. To one decydują o jakości organizacji, pracy i roli, jaką w demokratycznym państwie pełni sądownictwo. Sprawiedliwość, opierająca się na rządach prawa i stanowiąca najwyższą wartość dla społeczeństwa, może być realizowana wyłącznie w duchu tych dwóch wartości. Wszelkie przemiany i przekształcenia winny zmierzać do jednego celu, którego azymutem jest właśnie silna, niezależna władza sądownicza. Niniejszy artykuł jest wprowadzeniem do zrozumienia procesu odbudowy polskiego wymiaru sprawiedliwości po II wojnie światowej, poprzez zarysowanie problemów i wyzwań, z jakimi w tym okresie musiał się zmierzyć.
2
Content available remote

STATUTORY COMPENSATION MODEL FOR AI TRAINING BASED ON THE COPY LEVIES PAYMENT FRAMEWORK

100%
Madera A.
Annales Scientia Politica
|
2025
|
vol. 14
|
issue 1
39 – 47
EN
The article addresses the lack of adequate legal mechanisms regulating the use of copyrighted works in the training of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, particularly in the context of copyright law. The author argues that current licensing solutions, especially those based on collective rights management organizations are insufficient given the scale and nature of AI training operations. In response, the article proposes the adoption of a statutory compensation model inspired by the copy levies system used in the European Union. Under this framework, AI developers would be required to pay a fee for using protected content, with the proceeds distributed by authorized organizations to the rights holders. The article analyses both the advantages and limitations of this model, highlighting its potential as a tool for balancing the interests of creators and the innovation sector. The author contends that only a fair and systemic compensation mechanism can ensure the sustainable development of both AI technologies and creative industries.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.