Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Abstrakcji przestrzeń wieloraka. Kategoria przestrzenności w twórczości Wojciecha Fangora, Jerzego Grabowskiego i Ryszarda Winiarskiego - studium porównawcze

100%

Rozmarynowski Ł.

Artium Quaestiones

2020

issue 1

401-436

If one were to indicate some tendencies characteristic of the art of the 20th century, the pursuit of making artwork more spatial would certainly be one of them. This tendency manifests itself in the myriad of symptoms: an avant-garde redefinition of sculpture with its negative space; a proliferation of kinetic works enabling spectators to (re)shape artwork’s matter more actively; a dissemination of ephemeral forms, especially happening and performance; beginnings of installation art, to mention but a few. The present paper sets out to examine an artistic phenomenon which is not as spectacular as the aforementioned examples, but it could be somehow placed at the intersection of them. One can consider the particular type of abstract painting, embedded in a pictorial plane and slightly opening for surrounding space, but simultaneously reconceptualising the relation between the imagined and the physically present. The first part of the article deals with methodology. As far as research is concerned, the author assumes moderate scientism as the methodological perspective. It is based on the belief that mathematical sciences throughout history have developed notions and analytical methods allowing the observable and communicable features of things, including artworks and artistic phenomena, to be explained in an effective way, i.e. more faithfully and usefully. Because of the fact that mathematical truths are not absolute, the methodological perspective is called ‘moderate’. Taking into account these assumptions, the second part of the article defines the analytical category of spatiality, which expresses painting’s ability to evoke variously conceptualised spaces.The three subsequent sections of the article are devoted to some paintings by three Polish artists active in the second half of the 20th century, i.e. Wojciech Fangor, Jerzy Grabowski, Ryszard Winiarski. Each of them combined two differently understood spatial orders in their works: physical (related to phenomenological and sensual experience) and conceptual (related to notions and theories proposed by exact sciences). Having analysed a number of paintings by Fangor, Grabowski and Winiarski, one can define notions of cosmogonic, transcendence and probabilistic space, respectively. In summary, the specificity of works analysed in the context of ideas drawn from exact sciences is examined.

If one were to indicate some tendencies characteristic of the art of the 20th century, the pursuit of making artwork more spatial would certainly be one of them. This tendency manifests itself in the myriad of symptoms: an avant-garde redefinition of sculpture with its negative space; a proliferation of kinetic works enabling spectators to (re)shape artwork’s matter more actively; a dissemination of ephemeral forms, especially happening and performance; beginnings of installation art, to mention but a few. The present paper sets out to examine an artistic phenomenon which is not as spectacular as the aforementioned examples, but it could be somehow placed at the intersection of them. One can consider the particular type of abstract painting, embedded in a pictorial plane and slightly opening for surrounding space, but simultaneously reconceptualising the relation between the imagined and the physically present. The first part of the article deals with methodology. As far as research is concerned, the author assumes moderate scientism as the methodological perspective. It is based on the belief that mathematical sciences throughout history have developed notions and analytical methods allowing the observable and communicable features of things, including artworks and artistic phenomena, to be explained in an effective way, i.e. more faithfully and usefully. Because of the fact that mathematical truths are not absolute, the methodological perspective is called ‘moderate’. Taking into account these assumptions, the second part of the article defines the analytical category of spatiality, which expresses painting’s ability to evoke variously conceptualised spaces. The three subsequent sections of the article are devoted to some paintings by three Polish artists active in the second half of the 20th century, i.e. Wojciech Fangor, Jerzy Grabowski, Ryszard Winiarski. Each of them combined two differently understood spatial orders in their works: physical (related to phenomenological and sensual experience) and conceptual (related to notions and theories proposed by exact sciences). Having analysed a number of paintings by Fangor, Grabowski and Winiarski, one can define notions of cosmogonic, transcendence and probabilistic space, respectively. In summary, the specificity of works analysed in the context of ideas drawn from exact sciences is examined.

Między rozumem a instynktem twórczym. Leona Chwistka poglądy na krytykę sztuki

100%

Rozmarynowski Ł.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

2021

issue 39

23-43

Leon Chwistek was one of the most important thinkers in the inter-war Poland. As a philosopher, logician, artist and art theorist, he frequently commented on historical and contemporary aspects of artistic life, formulating his distinct ideas concerning art criticism. The aim of this article is to synthetically discuss these ideas and to outline the cultural and artistic context that shaped them. In order to achieve this goal, the author of the article refers to both the art theoretical output of Chwistek and his philosophy as well as scientific research. Having employed a descriptive method, the author presents the main questions of art criticism discussed by Chwistek in his various texts. The following aspects are examined: the role of art critics in society, experience as a basis of critical opinion, methodology of art critic’s work, criteria for evaluation of works of art and creative attitudes. In his writings Chwistek emphasized the importance of theory for artistic practice, but even more strongly he stressed the illuminating power of experience, which is able to undermine aesthetic dogmas and which should remain the basic determinant of critic’s activity.

Leon Chwistek był jednym z najważniejszych myślicieli w Polsce okresu międzywojennego. Będąc filozofem, logikiem, artystą i teoretykiem sztuki, niejednokrotnie komentował historyczne i współczesne sobie zjawiska życia artystycznego, a także formułował wyraziste poglądy na temat krytyki sztuki. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest syntetyczne omówienie tych poglądów i nakreślenie kontekstu, w jakim się one kształtowały. Tym samym w artykule autor odwołuje się nie tylko do osiągnięć teoretyczno-artystycznych Chwistka, ale również do jego filozofii i dokonań naukowych. W tym celu autor prezentuje kluczowe zagadnienia krytyki sztuki Chwistka w układzie problemowym, przeprowadzając analizę treści wybranych wypowiedzi i nakreślając ich konteksty kulturowe. Omówione zostają kolejno następujące aspekty: miejsce krytyki artystycznej w ogólnie pojętym życiu kulturalnym Polski międzywojennej, doświadczenie jako podstawa sądu krytycznego, metodologia pracy krytyka sztuki, kryteria wartościowania dzieł sztuki i postaw twórczych.

Refine search results

1 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

1 Artium Quaestiones

2 Rozmarynowski Ł.

1 2021

1 2020

Search results

Abstrakcji przestrzeń wieloraka. Kategoria przestrzenności w twórczości Wojciecha Fangora, Jerzego Grabowskiego i Ryszarda Winiarskiego - studium porównawcze

Między rozumem a instynktem twórczym. Leona Chwistka poglądy na krytykę sztuki