Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The provisions of the bill providing for the restriction of the entry into the territory of the Republic of Poland of carriers from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus are incompatible with the principles of the common commercial policy on the free importation of goods into the EU. Any action in this area may only be taken by the Union, while Member States may only do so on the authority of the Union or for the implementation of Union law.
EN
In the opinion of the author, the implementation of the Directive, which will replace the currently binding Council Directive 2010/18/EU implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave, should consist primarily in the implementation of those of its provisions which extend the existing parental leave rights of employees or introduce new rights. In essential part, this it is possible by amending certain provisions of the Labour Code Act.
EN
The opinion deals with the effects of the European Commission Implementing Decision whereby ellaOne is commercially available in all Member States without a prescription. The analysis leads to the conclusion that under the existing law, Poland is obliged to implement the decision of the Executive Committee and the medicinal product ellaOne should be available over-the-counter. Nevertheless, Polish legislature may decide to exclude or restrict the sale or use of medicinal products as contraceptives or abortifacients. Therefore, it is permissible to adopt a regulation to prohibit the sale of ellaOne or adopt provisions specifying that it will be available in Poland only on prescription.
EN
The subject of the opinion is the proposal for a directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base examined altogether with the proposal for a directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base (COM(2016) 685 final), as the second part of the same legal initiative of the European Commission. According to the authors, their introduction shall limit fiscal sovereignty of Member States. It might result in a  necessity of amendments of fiscal substantive law, organization of the tax administration, as well as tax procedures. Effects of the discussed draft rules regarding budget of the European Union and particular budgets of Member States are difficult to predict. Current analyses indicate that Poland might lose a part of its tax incomes. Adoption of the discussed rules shall have an influence on taxation of companies which are outside the subject-related scope of the directives, what raises concerns of constitutional nature. According to the authors, the proposal for a directive is incompatible with the principle of subsidiarity.
EN
The purpose of this opinion is to explain the legal basis of a “red card” procedure and the legal basis for the cooperation between the national parliaments of EU Member States, including the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, in relation to this procedure. The “red card” procedure involves scrutiny of the compatibility of EU draft legislative acts with the principle of subsidiarity and is operatively associated with the treatybased mechanism for submission by national parliaments of reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of draft legislation with the principle of subsidiarity. The possible concerted action of national parliaments on the “red card” procedure will have the same scope as that applied for “yellow card” and “orange card” procedures. According to the authors, decisions to be taken under “red card” procedure are not inconsistent with the Treaties, do not interfere with the procedures of “yellow card” and “orange card” and would not require changes to the Standing Orders of the Sejm. The legal basis (in both EU law and national law) for cooperation between national parliaments will be the same as the legal basis for their cooperation in the process of submitting reasoned opinions on the non- compliance of EU draft legislative acts with the principle of subsidiarity.
EN
The purpose of the opinion is to examine thoroughly the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Presently, the issue of clinical trials is regulated differently in particular EU member states, due to their different legal traditions and constitutional standards. By allowing for experimentation on human beings without their knowledge or consent, the proposed regulation substantially infringes the principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and conferred competences, as well as human dignity and the right to integrity of the person guaranteed by Articles 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. These circumstances sufficiently justify initiation by the Polish Sejm of the procedure specified in Article 6 of Protocol 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality annexed to the Lisbon Treaty.
EN
The subject of the opinion is a Proposal for a directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base examined altogether with the Proposal of a directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (COM(2016) 683 final) as the second part of the same initiative of the European Commission. Their introduction shall limit fiscal sovereignty of Member States. It might result in a necessity of amendments of fiscal substantive law, organization of the tax administration, as well as tax procedures. Effects of the discussed draft rules are regarding budget of the European Union and particular budgets of Member States difficult to predict. Current analyses indicate that Poland might lose a part of its tax incomes. Adoption of the discussed rules shall have an influence on taxation of companies which are outside the subject-related scope of the directives, what raises many concerns of constitutional nature. According to the authors, the proposal for a directive is incompatible with the principle of subsidiarity.
EN
Opinion concerns the compatibility with EU law of the proposal to exclude the application of the provisions of the Act on Personal Data Protection, specifying the rules for the processing of personal data in relation to the data processing for soldiers in candidate service. According to the authors, the processing of personal data of soldiers in candidate service takes place in the course of processing operations concerning defence within the meaning of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. The exception to the principles of personal data processing, as provided for in the bill, is in conformity with EU law.
EN
The authors, following an analysis of compliance of the proposal with the principle of subsidiarity, conclude that the proposed regulation does not allow for “better” fulfilment of its declared aim (to contribute to the goal of a more efficient, interconnected and sustainable functioning of the trans‑European transport network) rather than by legislating at national level. The proposal infringes the subsidiarity principle. The European Commission has not sufficiently justified the need for the proposed action. Improvement of the quality of port services and modernisation of port facilities in order to increase efficiency of operation of TEN‑T ports as well as their greater financial transparency aimed at attracting investments, can be achieved by the Member States without need for intervention from the EU.
EN
The paper presents information on the legal regulation of the profession of a psychologist in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Portugal, and Norway. In the European Union law that profession is covered by the so-called general system of recognition of professional qualifications. The article examines legal provisions regulating the profession, the qualification and educational requirements, and the conditions for practising psychology in the above-mentioned countries.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.