Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Folia historica Bohemica

Authors help

  1. 2 Černý K.

Years help

  1. 1 2010

  2. 1 2009

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Disciplína a další aspekty řádové organizace v české dominikánské provincii (podle zápisů provinciálů z let 1653-1721)

100%
Černý K.
Folia historica Bohemica
|
2010
|
vol. 25
|
issue 2
67-112
EN
Between the 15th and 16th century, the Bohemian province of the Dominican Order underwent a crisis caused by the political and religious situation in Bohemia and Moravia. The general climate changed after the Battle of the White Mountain, but this change did not involve an immediate transformation of the Dominican Order in the Bohemian province. The essay explains certain aspects of the monastic discipline (i.e. clothing, disposal of property, fasting, etc.) between circa 1650-1720 and shows how the province gradually changed and adopted stricter rules which were common in foreign convents.
2
Content available remote

Zázraky, historie a biomedicína

100%
Černý K.
Folia historica Bohemica
|
2009
|
vol. 24
|
issue 1
7-19
EN
The essay analyses three main methodological approaches towards healing miracles in the Middle Ages and Early Modern time. It stems from a division suggested by Anne-Marie Korte in her project on a gender nature of miracles and comments on the sceptical, apologetic and hermeneutic starting points. The sceptical and apologetic approaches have traditionally been employed for a long time; they evolved into the current form during the so-called scientific revolution between 16th and 17th century. Both of them seemingly represent an “objective standpoint”: the first one as a rational scientific analysis and second one from a religion perspective. The paper, however, demonstrates that both these historical models of “miracles” are largely insufficient and cannot be used in modern research. The remaining alternative, which A.-M. Korte calls the “hermeneutic approach”, differs from the previous two. It does not define a principle of miracle, but it describes a miraculous event through words and meanings as they were voiced by persons directly affected by it. The essay enumerates several thematic spheres (gender, the problem of memory, social authority and interpretation), which, according to the author, are particularly promising for future research.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.