Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Research background: Rural areas in Poland occupy more than 93% of the country's area. This high share somehow automatically becomes a source of causes and effects of differences both at the regional and local level. Development disproportions in rural areas become vividly visible in the places of accumulation of developmental barriers, which derive from the effect of social, economic, environmental and historical factors. The arguments which refer to the place-based policy stress the fact that making use of the unused potential of intermediate and poorly developed territories may actually influence the local and national level of development (Farole et al., 2011). Rural areas, especially peripheral areas, are undoubtedly the territories of unused potential. Purpose of the article: The aim of the research is to measure the socioeconomic development, including the spatial diversification leading to the development of rural peripheral areas. Methods: Development is a multidimensional phenomenon. There-fore, its level will be determined by means of the synthetic feature. The synthetic feature will be used as the starting point for identification of peripheral areas and their delimitation. The Jenks method was applied to group entities into classes characterised by similar levels of development (Jenks Natural Breaks Classifica-tion, Jenks, 1967). The spatial scope of the research comprises rural areas in Poland in the western borderland, i.e. West Pomeranian, Lubuskie and Lower Silesian Voivodeships. The research subject were rural and rural-urban communes of the regions under investigation. The empirical material were obtained from the following sources: the Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Office, unpublished data of the Agricultural Property Agency. Measurements referred to 2015.The object of the study was the development of rural areas in the western borderland, which was identified by comparison of the synthetic features of the following factors: location rent, technical infrastructure, social infrastructure, human capital, social capital and local finance. Findings & value added: The results of the analysis showed significant differences level of socioeconomic development of rural areas in the western borderland. The research findings did not show a simple dependence between rural development and the share of former state-owned farms in the communes. Areas with a high share of former state-owned farms could be found both in the group of best- and least-developed communes. Due to the range of research, it is illegitimate to make other than intuitive inferences. Thus, we can intuitively indicate that the following group of factors triggered the process of development and helped to break the barriers resulting from the liquidation of state-owned farms: location in an urban agglomeration, natural and tourist values as well as the activity of local authorities. The research should be continued in order to identify the factors and pathways of development in individual areas under analysis.
PL
W pracy dokonano pomiaru ładu społecznego. Stanowiło to punkt wyjścia do przeprowadzenia delimitacji obszarów wiejskich pogranicza zachodniego. Za przesłankę peryferyjności przyjęto niski poziom badanej kategorii. Pomiaru dokonano z wykorzystaniem miary syntetycznej. Badaniami objęto 310 gmin województw dolnośląskiego, lubuskiego i zachodniopomorskiego. Badania przeprowadzono dla lat 2008-2012. Otrzymane wyniki badań dowiodły znaczenia sytuacji demograficznej w kształtowaniu peryferyjności.
EN
The article presents changes in the level of development of technical infrastructure communes of the Wielkopolska voivodeship in 2012 compared to 2004. The study analysed the level of the phenomenon one of the taxonomic methods-synthetic measure of development Hellwig was used, and to compare both classifications table mullioned and calculated statistic c2 was used. It was concluded that, there had been major changes to the equipment in the individual elements of the technical infrastructure between 2004 and 2012. All types of infrastructure were reduced and the diversification observed, particularly large for sewage system, water supply system to a smaller extent, which in turn, however, still has a high density dispersion.
PL
W opracowaniu przedstawiono zmiany w zakresie poziomu rozwoju gminnej infrastruktury technicznej w województwie wielkopolskim w 2012 roku w relacji do 2004 roku. W badaniu poziomu analizowanego zjawiska posłużono się jedną z taksonomicznych metod – syntetycznym miernikiem rozwoju Hellwiga, a do porównania klasyfikacji w 2004 i 2012 roku posłużyła tablica wielodzielna i obliczona statystyka c2.
PL
Zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich to proces pozytywnych zmian zachodzących w obszarze ładu gospodarczego, społecznego i środowiskowego. Pozwala on na rozwój lub podtrzymanie funkcji rolniczych przy jednoczesnym wzmacnianiu funkcji pozarolniczych, umożliwiając poprawę jakości życia mieszkańców społeczności lokalnych i gospodarując środowiskiem z troską o zaspokojenie potrzeb przyszłych pokoleń. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja czynników zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich województwa wielkopolskiego oraz jego pomiar z wykorzystaniem tych czynników. Do identyfikacji czynników zrównoważonego rozwoju posłużono się analizą czynnikową. Pomiar zrównoważonego rozwoju wykonano miarą syntetyczną. Dane pozyskano z Banku Danych Lokalnych GUS. Przeprowadzone badania pozwoliły na wskazanie wiodących czynników zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, takich jak: sytuacja ludnościowa (demograficzna), spójność ekonomiczna i przestrzenna oraz stan infrastruktury środowiska.
EN
Sustainable rural development is a process of positive changes in the economic, social and environmental domain. This process enables the development or maintenance of agricultural functions and the simultaneous strengthening of non-agricultural functions. It improves the quality of life of the inhabitants of local communities and manages the environment with due care for the needs of future generations. The aim of this article is to identify the factors of sustainable rural development and to measure development with the factors identified in this study. The factors of sustainable development were identified by means of factor analysis. Sustainable development was measured with a synthetic measure. The data for analyses came from the Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Office. The research enabled the identification of major factors of sustainable rural development: the demographic situation, economic and spatial cohesion and the state of environmental infrastructure.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.