Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Paradigma a Mukařovského pojetí literární struktury

100%

Papoušek V.

Česká literatura (Czech Literature)

2007

vol. 55

issue 3

398-405

This is a response to Aleš Haman’s “Dějiny literatury, literární dějiny nebo dějiny literárnosti?” (A History of Literature, Literary History, or a History of Literariness?) published in Česká literatura, 4/2006, in which Haman considers, among other things, the relationship between Mukařovský’s concept of the norm and Papoušek’s concept of the paradigm. The author explains that he sees Mukařovský’s concept of the “norm” as “layers or simply as individually definable entities with a more or less homogenous essence,” whereas he sees the paradigm “as a set of possibilities of imagination and discourses carried on in a specific historical period by a specific community.” The author sees the Structuralist “norm” as a way to analyze a particular work, whereas he understands research into the paradigm of a period as an opportunity to study a work of literature in the context of its times.

Modus exprese osobní paměti v literárním textu

100%

Papoušek V.

Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne

2019

issue 16

209-226

The main thesis of the author of this study is the opinion that so called personal memory transformed into the literary text is not in any case the representation of past reality of individual. So called personal memory in literature is always set of speech acts with evident intention of narrator. This thesis the author prooved on text of four czech exile authors – Hostovsky, Souckova, Barenyi and Kundera.

Refine search results

1 Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne

1 Česká literatura (Czech Literature)

2 Papoušek V.

1 2019

1 2007

Search results

Paradigma a Mukařovského pojetí literární struktury

Modus exprese osobní paměti v literárním textu