Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Teologia w Polsce
|
2014
|
vol. 8
|
issue 1
179-194
EN
The theological cognition act, which has constituted a subject of investigation for ages, is today related to new questions posed by the contemporary context. The notion of the social humanity legitimization is what influences its understanding. The question concerning the theological cognition act has a deep anthropological dimension in a double sense: from the side of the method – it is a human act, therefore its analysis may be based on elements of anthropological structure: logos, ethos and pathos; from the side of the performer: it is an act of the particular person living in the particular time. This means that the theological cognition act cannot be limited only to sentence assertion or system construction, but it must consider the dynamics of a human being in its relative character, as well as the total dedication to God.
PL
Akt poznania teologicznego, który przez wieki wielokrotnie stanowił przedmiot dociekań, dzisiaj związany jest z nowymi pytaniami stawianymi przez współczesny kontekst. Na jego rozumienie wpływa współczesne zagadnienie społecznej legitymizacji humanistyki. Pytanie o akt poznania teologicznego posiada głęboki wymiar antropologiczny w podwójnym sensie: od strony metody jest aktem człowieka, a więc jego analiza może opierać się na elementach struktury antropologicznej (logos, ethos i pathos); od strony jego wykonawcy jest aktem konkretnej osoby żyjącej w konkretnym czasie. Oznacza to, że aktu poznania teologicznego nie można ograniczyć jedynie do asercji zdań lub systemu, ale trzeba w nim uwzględnić dynamikę ludzkiej osoby w jej relacyjnym charakterze oraz całoosobowe przylgnięcie do Boga.
EN
Girard indicates an ancient text which we perfectly know as one of the books of the Holy Scripture - the Book of Job. He presents the ominous face of the sacred, the idea of a divinity, in the name of which a scapegoat can be selected and executed. Job for Girard is an unsuccessful scapegoat, i.e. the one that has not accepted his fault. Had Job not rebel against the social intentions, today he would be an example of another subject of collective violence which brought unity to its community. The theory of Girard, who is of the opinion that each culture is based on founding murder and secondary sacralisation of the victim is particularly popular today, in the age of the problem of terrorism. Slavoj Žižek, commenting Benjamin, takes up this thread we are interested in. This theological dimension is divine violence, understood as intervention of a transcendent justice. Such an interpretation of religiously motivated terrorism is so far from Benjamin’s divine justice, that Žižek does not continue this thread. However, the person who does this is Płuciennik, who stresses that terrorists’ motivation has iconoclastic dimension. He notices that there is a strong current in the contemporary intellectual landscape, which refers to apocalyptic thinking, connected with retribution theology.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2015
|
vol. 9
|
issue 2
195-212
EN
Epistemological question posed by interpretive practice in theology, requires a supplement in the form of a covenant, which can be associated with the project of ontologization known from the history of hermeneutics. This makes us realize that theological language, understood as a system, in the technical meaning of the word, does not constitute a separate and self-protective speech about God. Language is only a system of meanings that is referring to itself. Its reference to reality, and therefore to the experience of God, is associated with the authorizing role of the community. Even the sacred texts as well as textual (in a narrow sense) testimonies in the Tradition, are not self-sufficient elements which can be deprived of their ecclesial and, because of it, experiential context. Otherwise, the Revelation would have to be limited to information only.
PL
Pytanie epistemologiczne, które stawia praktyka interpretacyjna, w teologii domaga się uzupełnienia w postaci przymierza, które skojarzone może być z projektem ontologizacji znanej z dziejów hermeneutyki. Uświadamia nam to, że język teologiczny, rozumiany jako system w znaczeniu technicznym tego słowa, nie stanowi odrębnej i samozabezpieczającej się mowy o Bogu. Język stanowi jedynie pewien układ znaczeń, który odnosi się sam do siebie. Jego odniesienie do rzeczywistości, a więc doświadczenia Boga, jest związane z autoryzacyjną rolą wspólnoty. Sam nawet natchniony tekst, a także tekstowe (w sensie wąskim) świadectwa Tradycji nie są elementami samowystarczalnymi, które można by pozbawić eklezjalnego i przez to doświadczeniowego kontekstu. W przeciwnym wypadku Objawienie musiałoby zostać ograniczone do informacji.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.