Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kierkegaarda droga poznania Boga

100%
Urbańska-Bożek M.
Gdański Rocznik Ewangelicki
|
2016
|
vol. 10
206-224
EN
This article shows a method of the recognition of God, which we can find in the philosophical and theological thought of the thinker from Copenhagen. This method is different from the one we can find in the history of religious ideas of the West Europe, that, to a considerable degree, fluctuated around Augustin’s credo ut intelligam and Anselm‘s fides quaerens intellectum. Naturally, we remember the maxim of Tertullian, who professed credo quia absurdum and who, in his De carne Christi, formulated this idea during of the polemic with Hellenistic thinkerswho accused Christianity of irrationality. However, in the Middle Ages, thinkers did not appeal to this idea, because the thought of this period, above all, wanted to subordinate faith the reason or to reconcile the reason and faith. Søren Kierkegaard suggests that when all other possibilities of knowledge of God have failed, we can turn back and attempt a new method. In other words, it is necessary to completely discard the reason to make the jump into faith and to live in truth on the model of Christ, God Incarnate.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Miłość w aspekcie metafizycznym i etycznym w kontekście myśli Henri Bergsona i Franza Rosenzweiga

100%
Urbańska-Bożek M.
Gdański Rocznik Ewangelicki
|
2015
|
vol. 9
258-276
EN
In the article it was shown how Henri Bergson and Franz Rosenzweig understand love, as a principle, which actualise in the double context: as a me¬ta¬physical and ethical principle. Love in its first context actualises as a me¬taphysical principle, as a principle of originate life in toto, in the second it is a regulatory of social life of human beings. In its first context it was ex-pressed as love of God to man, whereas in the second as man’s love to God. God’s love and its metaphysical character expresses in creation/the gift of existence received in the power of loving the other man, whereas we- humanity- response on God’s love in voluntary acts of other’s love. There-fore this love has the ethical character as well.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Na początku był Chrystus”. Bp Jerzy Pańkowski, bp Marcin Hintz, bp Grzegorz Ryś. Rozmawiają... (Maria Urbańska-Bożek)

100%
Urbańska-Bożek M.
Gdański Rocznik Ewangelicki
|
2016
|
vol. 10
248-255
PL
Recenzja książki pt. „Na początku był Chrystus". Bp Jerzy Pańkowski, bp Marcin Hintz, bp Grzegorz Ryś. Rozmawiają Jakub Drath i Janusz Poniewierski, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków 2016, 152 s.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Logocentryczna metafizyka Arystotelesa a Bergsona metafizyka pozytywna

100%
Urbańska-Bożek M.
Gdański Rocznik Ewangelicki
|
2014
|
vol. 8
280-294
EN
In this article I want to show similarities, analogies, and differences between the main categories constituting the fundamental principle on which the logocentric metaphysics of Aristotle and the positive metaphysics of Bergson were constructed. Both metaphysical theories, on the grounds of understanding of the reality and rudimentary principles, that govern this reality, do not show significant discrepancies. Both, in my opinion, try to bring to the fore these metaphysical categories, which represent paradigms for the same power, energy, principle of life, or just life manifesting itself in a movement, a becoming and a flow that operates rationally and consciously, that is to say, intentionally. This power infiltrates and connects beings to one another and, in this way, each one and all are related to each one. This power is Bergson’s élan vital - that within animals is manifested as instinct, whereas within people, it sublimates into intuition - and Aristotle’s individual nature of things (phisis), as the inner principle of movement and rest within the individual being. The main factors for the different interpretations and incomparability of these two theories are, as I suppose; language as a tool for description of reality and different hermeneutics of rationality that the two philosophers represent. The language used for the description of reality, at the level of metaphysics is a result of the aforementioned different hermeneutics.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.