Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Z uszanowaniem od Autora: refleksje nad Austinem i Derridą

100%
Fish S.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2010
|
issue 20/21
PL
This essay is concerned with Jacques Derrida's arguments promulgated in “Signature Event Context” which Fish confronts with J. L. Austin's views on performative language.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Stanowisko tekstualne nie istnieje

100%
Fish S.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2006
|
issue 12
EN
Leszek Drong's Polish translation of Stanley Fish's essay.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Z uszanowaniem od Autora: refleksje nad Austinem i Derridą

100%
Fish S.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2001
|
issue 2
EN
This essay is concerned with Jacques Derrida's arguments promulgated in “Signature Event Context” which Fish confronts with J. L. Austin's views on performative language.
4
Content available remote

Notatki z Folger

100%
Fish S.
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
|
2009
|
issue 16
267-280
EN
The text written by Stanley Fish, which is an excerpt from his book Professional Correctness. Literary Studies and Political Change (Oxford 1995), is an attempt at a presentation and a discussion of the main conditioning factors and the aporia of interpretation. From among the four arguments given by the author, i.e. intention, historicalness, politicalness and interdisciplinarity, only the first one has been established to be an immanent feature of each of interpretations. This results from the conviction that while interpreting literary texts we are always subjected to the pressure of the surrounding premises. It is just the extensive and thorough analysis of these premises, to which the supporters of political, historical and interdisciplinary criticism refer to that makes the author of the sketch possible to show that behind each of the methods there are individual interests and a different vision of the world. To realize these determinants is to enable us to question the very need of universal interpretation. By questioning the theoretical fundamentals of the three mentioned modes of interpretation, the author admits frankly that the work of an interpreter can have both historical, political and just as well interdisciplinary character, though this observation is by all means tantamount to a recognition of the legitimacy of any of the criticized methods.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Jestem (tylko) słabym amerykańskim antyfundacjonalistą (ze Stanleyem Fishem rozmawia Leszek Drong)

63%
Fish S., Drong L.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2004
|
issue 9
EN
Stanley Fish, I Am (Just) a Weak American Antifoundationalist (Leszek Drong talks to Stanley Fish) In an interview with Stanley Fish Leszek Drong discusses his inspiration by French intellectuals and the development of his philosophical views.
PL
Stanley Fish, I Am (Just) a Weak American Antifoundationalist (Leszek Drong talks to Stanley Fish) In an interview with Stanley Fish Leszek Drong discusses his inspiration by French intellectuals and the development of his philosophical views.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.