Existing literature on introduction sequence mostly argues against introducing a low-end product before a high-end product. In this paper, we present a simple model to show when it can be optimal to introduce a low-end product first. Based on some observations in industry, high-end consumers are not only wealthier, but also more demanding in quality. With this property, introducing a low-end product first without commitment would not cannibalize the high-end segment because it does not satisfy the quality requirements of the high-end consumers. We also allow for a stochastic environment: the firm may find it valuable to retain flexibility, or the so-called "real options", rather than make commitment about forthcoming products. With this model setup, we add a different perspective that it can be optimal to introduce a low-quality product first for purely marketing reasons. We show that functionality thresholds can play the same role as Piguovian third degree discrimination.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.