Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czym jest dziś czytanie literatury? Ankieta

100%
Mazan B., Uniwersytet Łódzki W. F., Bogdan Mazan — profesor zwyczajny w Katedrze Literatury Pozytywizmu i Młodej Polski Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Autor m. i., bogmaz@uni.lodz.pl
Czytanie Literatury. Łódzkie Studia Literaturoznawcze
|
2012
|
vol. 01
FR
Questionnaire
EN
When asked about the most important book in his life-long reading experience, Bogdan Mazan selects the Bible. When feeling blue, he chooses the collection This is the Day the Lord Has Made: 365 Daily Meditations (Dziś jest dzień Pański. Rozważania na każdy dzień, Polish translation by J. Iwaszkiewicz, Poznań 2000) by a Belgian Carmelite and Doctor of Philosophy Wilfrid Stinissen or a book by Henri Brunel, The Smile of Buddha. Zen Humor (transl. M. Pluta, Warsaw, 2004); when sad, he also reads Hašek’s Adventures of Good Soldier Svejk. In hopelessly grim situations, the author recommends to read the novel by Gottfried Burger The Adventures of Baron Münchhausen.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Lustra, symptomy i głębsze znaczenie

100%
Mazan B., Uniwersytet Łódzki W. F., Bogdan Mazan — profesor zwyczajny w Katedrze Literatury Pozytywizmu i Młodej Polski Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Autor m. i., bogmaz@uni.lodz.pl
Czytanie Literatury. Łódzkie Studia Literaturoznawcze
|
2012
|
vol. 01
PL
Recenzja: Lena Magnone, Konopnicka. Lustra i symptomy, Gdańsk 2011, wyd. słowo/obraz terytoria, 575 ss.
EN
This was the title of a review of the book Konopnicka. Lustra i symptomy (słowo/obraz terytoria, Gdańsk 2011, p. 575) by Lena Magnore. The book is an abridged and edited version of her doctoral thesis. Opinions in my review are presented in a form of notes from reading academic literature. The purpose of Magnore’s book was a discussion with the homogeneous image of Konopnicka’s life and writings and attempt to make her image consistent. In order to achieve this goal, the author used modern methodologies and selected categories of the contemporary humanities, mostly psychoanalysis and gender studies. As a result, Konopnicka appears as a woman seen through the prism of charm and fear of femininity. The book allows to look at Konopnicka’s writing in different and unorthodox manner, provides sensitive documentation of difficult and painful issues. The use of “psychoanalytical key of interpretation” makes it possible to see different mechanism of denying femininity, important “wounds of text”, motifs unknown in traditional writings about maternity, different forms of hysteria.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.