Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  1092
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article is devoted to the Cyrillic and Glagolitic Gospel manuscripts that were published in the 19th and the 20th century and which are of great importance for the written Slavonic tradition. It describes advantages and disadvantages of the selected examples of Gospel text editions. The article focuses on using these publications for a detailed text research. In this background, both of the two editions of the Arkhangelsk Gospel are discussed: the first one (a facsimile) from 1912, and the second one (a text edition) from 1997. A comparison of the Gospel text and the liturgical information in these two publications of the Arkhangelsk Gospel shows that there are some differences between them. Making these differences available to the reader will allow using an easily available text edition for textual criticism, instead of using the facsimile of the Arkhangelsk Gospel, which is hard to find.
Rocznik Teologiczny
|
2014
|
vol. 56
|
issue 1
41-48
PL
Ewangeliarz archangielski z 1092 roku jest jednym z najważniejszych źródeł w badaniach wschodniosłowiańskiej tradycji rękopiśmiennej. Był publikowany dwukrotnie: w 1912 (faksymile) i 1997 roku. Drugie wydanie (edycja tekstu) nie było wierne oryginałowi. Jej pierwsza trudno dostępna errata została opublikowana w roku 1998 (po japońsku), druga w 2012 (i 2013) roku. Niestety, w tych dwóch publikacjach nie zostały wymienione wszystkie niedokładności między edycją tekstu Ewangeliarza archangielskiego i jego oryginałem. Niniejszy artykuł zawiera tylko nieścisłości opuszczone w drugiej erracie z 2012 (i 2013) roku.
EN
The Archangelsk Gospel from the year 1092 is one of the most important sources for research of the east Slavonic manuscript tradition. It was published twice: in the year 1912 (facsimile) and 1997. The second edition (with edited text) wasn’t faithful to its original. Its first errata, hardly accessible, was published in 1998 (in Japanese) and second in 2012 (and 2013).Unfortunately these two publications didn’t enumerate all discrepancies between the edition of Archangelsk Gospel in 1997 and its original. This article mentions only the inaccuracies that weren’t published at errata form 2012 (and 2013).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.