Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  1912
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
On 25–27th September 1912, scientific and clergy circles in Cracow hosted the Catholic Congress to commemorate Piotr Skarga. It constituted the main element of the Polish commemoration of the 300th Anniversary of Piotr Skarga’s death. Beyond-partitions nature of the meeting was reflected in the composition of the organizing committee, the issues discussed, and the resolutions passed. The Congress also provided an opportunity to manifest the connections between Polish circles in public. The Congress’ commemoration of Piotr Skarga should also be considered as an element of a reliable method that allowed scientific and socio-professional circles to establish and maintain contacts beyond partitions.
Rocznik Teologiczny
|
2014
|
vol. 56
|
issue 1
41-48
PL
Ewangeliarz archangielski z 1092 roku jest jednym z najważniejszych źródeł w badaniach wschodniosłowiańskiej tradycji rękopiśmiennej. Był publikowany dwukrotnie: w 1912 (faksymile) i 1997 roku. Drugie wydanie (edycja tekstu) nie było wierne oryginałowi. Jej pierwsza trudno dostępna errata została opublikowana w roku 1998 (po japońsku), druga w 2012 (i 2013) roku. Niestety, w tych dwóch publikacjach nie zostały wymienione wszystkie niedokładności między edycją tekstu Ewangeliarza archangielskiego i jego oryginałem. Niniejszy artykuł zawiera tylko nieścisłości opuszczone w drugiej erracie z 2012 (i 2013) roku.
EN
The Archangelsk Gospel from the year 1092 is one of the most important sources for research of the east Slavonic manuscript tradition. It was published twice: in the year 1912 (facsimile) and 1997. The second edition (with edited text) wasn’t faithful to its original. Its first errata, hardly accessible, was published in 1998 (in Japanese) and second in 2012 (and 2013).Unfortunately these two publications didn’t enumerate all discrepancies between the edition of Archangelsk Gospel in 1997 and its original. This article mentions only the inaccuracies that weren’t published at errata form 2012 (and 2013).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.