Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ARCHBISHOP
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

OSTRIHOMSKÝ ARCIBISKUP DIONÝZ ZO SEČE, VÝZNAMNÝ PRELÁT, POLITIK A DIPLOMAT 15. STOROČIA

100%
Dvořáková D.
Studia Historica Nitriensia
|
2020
|
vol. 24
|
issue 2
294 – 307
EN
The Archbishop of Esztergom (lat. Strigonium), Dionisius of Szecs, is considered a controversial figure in historical literature. In a short time, he crowned two Hungarian kings: 14 May 1440 as a faithful servant of Queen Elizabeth her three-month-old son, Ladislav the Posthumous, and 17 July 1440, apparently under pressure, also his enemy Vladislaus I. Despite the indisputable fact of the double coronation, the historians are now more cautious regarding the role of the Archbishop. As an excellent speaker and diplomat, he favored negotiations over violence and was instrumental in settling several seemingly insoluble conflicts. He also played an important role in the election of Mathias Corvinus as King of Hungary, which he eventually crowned (as the third ruler in his life). His merits in the church are also important: despite the difficult period he began to build the cathedral and archbishop's palace in Esztergom, convened several church synods, supported monasteries and increased the importance of the Archbishop of Esztergom by achieving the title Primate of Hungarian churche.
2

PALATINE PAULUS PALFFY´S CONFLICT WITH ARCHBISHOP GEORGIUS LIPPAY OF ESZTERGOM

75%
Fundárková A.
Historický časopis (Historical Journal)
|
2007
|
vol. 55
|
issue suppl. issue
61 – 78
EN
The present study deals with Palatine P. Palffy´s conflict with the Archbishop of Esztergom Georgius Lippay in the years 1646 – 1653. The author used archive materials from the Trautmansdorf family archive and from the memorandum written by P. Palffy to the Emperor Ferdinand III. in 1650. As there are no archive documents, J. Lippay´s attitude to P. Palffy is not known. P. Palffy and J. Lippay were leaders of political groups that were against each other and their conflicts took place in the Hungarian parliament and at gatherings of the Hungarian nobility. The Vienna court was a significant place where these two representatives had their quarrels. The conflict had a negative influence of the 17th century Hungary. Because of Rákoczy´s expeditions and Turkish attacks, Hungary faced an economic crisis, that required a unified approach from the Hungarian representatives, but the situation was different.
3

HERALDIKA V PROSTREDÍ STREDOVEKÝCH UHORSKÝCH ARCIBISKUPOV A BISKUPOV

75%
Glejtek M.
Studia Historica Nitriensia
|
2020
|
vol. 24
|
issue 1
18 – 35
EN
Heraldry represents the most elaborate identification system established in the Middle Ages. Initially, in the first half of the 12th century, coats of arms spread among knights and nobles. Over time, they became adopted by corporations such as town communities, guilds as well as burghers themselves. The oldest known coats of arms belonging to Hungarian ecclesiastical dignitaries are from a later time – the first half of the 14th century. The coats of arms belonging to the oldest phase of Hungarian ecclesiastical heraldry were known only from their depictions on seals. In the 15th century, the diversity of sources widened. Coats of arms represented an important part of owners’ visual presentation. In the circles of the highest ecclesiastical hierarchy, they were also a symbol of prestige and position in the Church structure. The presented study deals with the conditions of coat-of-arms usage among Hungarian prelates. It focuses on the inner structure (content) of these coats of arms as well as their formal appearance.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.