Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  AREA
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

SPATIALITY/AREA AND LITERATURE (Prostorovost/spacialnost/arealovost a literatura)

100%
Pospisil I.
World Literature Studies
|
2010
|
vol. 2 (19)
|
issue 1
61-73
EN
The author opens his explanation with the analysis of various concepts of space and time in the literary artefact, of the space as a constitutive element of the formation of the artefact mentioning the works of G. Bachelard, M. Bakhtin, and D. Hodrova including his own analyses of literary genres going back to the 1970s, and demonstrates the problems of the complicated link between the literary space and time. In the passage on the space as an extrinsic condition of the existence of the literary artefact he shows the Brno concept of area studies and the relations of the area and some further similar spheres and concepts. They are, above all, the spatial relations of the language and literature stressing sociology and political science and the problem of disciplinarity, inter- and multidisciplinarity, i.e. the identification of the discipline in the sense of the 'craft'. It is inevitable to avoid the shallow modishness of area studies, rather to relativize them, to search for their relations to other disciplines, e. g. to visualisation, iconosphere, theory of literary history, dialogue of cultures, and culture studies as such. This is the basis of the relation of the spatial aspect of philological and social disciplines in area studies. Its kernel should be the language and literature study (Brno concept of the integrated genre typology) which represents not only the means, but the aim itself in the sense of the so-called inter-poeticity, i. e. the permeation of the extrinsic (area, spatial) and intrinsic (poetological) circle even R. Wellek as well as D. Durisin did not succeed in.
2
Content available remote

Nářeční situace na přechodu severovýchodočeské a středočeské oblasti (Na materiálu korespondenčních anket ÚJČ)

75%
Bachmannova J.
Naše řeč (Our Speech)
|
2008
|
vol. 69
|
issue 4
178-192
EN
The article deals with the results of dialect correspondence surveys from the beginning of the 1950s that were carried out in the north-eastern and central Bohemian regions and confronts these results with newer data from the Czech Linguistic Atlas. On the basis of several selected dialect phenomena, it shows the continuous decline of the traditional dialect proceeding from the archaic dialect peripheries to the centre of the country. In this way, it depicts the dialect situation on the border of the north-eastern and central Bohemian regions and shows evidence of the transitive character of the central Bohemian dialect region. It contains 5 maps.
3

Severozápadní okraj středočeské nářeční oblasti (na materiálu korespondenčních anket ÚJČ)

75%
Bachmannova J.
Naše řeč (Our Speech)
|
2010
|
vol. 93
|
issue 2
83-95
EN
The article explores the results of dialect correspondence surveys from the beginning of the 1950s that were carried out in the central and northeastern Bohemian regions and confronts these results with newer data from the Czech Linguistic Atlas. It devotes attention to the analysis of the archaic language situation on the northwestern periphery of the central Bohemian dialectal region, traces the permeation of dialectal phenomena from the neighbouring regions and determines which of these may have led to the territorial delimitation of the Louny-Litomerice peripheral zone.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.