Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Adolf Černý
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Dopisy Adolfa Černého Melanii a Alfonsovi Parczewským. Příspěvek k česko-polským vztahům

100%
Andrysiak E., Steczek-Czerniawska E.
Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)
|
2014
|
vol. 100
|
issue 1
141-178
EN
This article describes the contents of the letters written in 1889–1919 by Adolf Černý to the siblings Alfons and Melania Parczewski in Kalisz, which are preserved in the Lithuanian National Historical Archives in Vilnius. They concern the personal and scientific-literary relations between the correspondents, and the subject of Lusatia is often raised. The presentation of their contents is preceded by information on Adolf Černý’s letters that had been previously published as well as a biographical sketch of their author and his addressees. Melania Parczewska was a writer, publicist and translator as well as a social, cultural and political activist, and her brother, the lawyer Alfons Parczewski, was a social and political activist and defender of minorities’ rights.
2
Content available remote

Historická rusistika na stránkách Slovanského přehledu: tradice a současnost

88%
Vlček R.
Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)
|
2015
|
vol. 101
|
issue 3
497-528
EN
This analytical study discusses the interest among Czech historians who research Russian history spanning from its earliest periods to 1917. It is a case study that demonstrates this interest in the example of the periodical the Slavonic Review. Part of this study is an analysis of the tradition of Czech (Czechoslovak) research into Russian history and the historians’ confrontations on the pages of the Slavonic Review. The work treats the topical and methodological transformations in the research chronologically, and pays tribute to the significant personalities who published historical Russian studies work in this periodical.
3
Content available remote

Význam Slovanského přehledu pro českou (zejména literárněvědnou) bulharistiku

51%
Černý M.
Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)
|
2015
|
vol. 101
|
issue 3
627-671
EN
This contribution analyzes Bulgarian subjects in the Slavonic Review in the years 1898–2014. Particular attention is devoted to the 1st and 2nd stages of the journal’s existence (before 1939), and important findings by leading scholars of Bulgaria are discussed, as are the personal contacts maintained by the editor-in-chief Adolf Černý, along with those of his friends who also specialized in Bulgarian studies. The development of the field in the postwar years is also briefly sketched out, with special emphasis on the decade following the putsch in February 1948 and the so-called normalization period, when Bulgarian studies were politicized within the framework of an overall ideologization of scholarship. One of the most fundamental changes made to the contents of the journal was its transformation from a popular non-fiction periodical featuring wide-ranging cultural-historical subject matter into an outlet for purely historical studies, which took place when the editorship was transferred from the Slavonic Institute ČSAV (later the Institute for Languages and Literatures ČSAV) to the Institute for the History of European Socialist Countries ČSAV in 1964, and subsequently to the Czechoslovak-Soviet Institute ČSAV. After November 1989 the field of Bulgarian studies (now free of negative ideological encumbrances) was cultivated in the spirit of the long-standing tradition of Czech-Bulgarian relations and often benefited from interdisciplinary encroachments into ethnology, political science, the history of scholarship, cultural history, Byzantine studies, and Balkan studies.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.