Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Alexander Herzen
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Obecność idei Piotra Czaadajewa w dyskursie o człowieku Aleksandra Hercena

100%
Uglik J.
Przegląd Humanistyczny
|
2016
|
vol. 60(2 (453))
49-56
PL
In the article I discuss the influence of Pyotr Chaadayev’s thoughts contained in the first Philosophical Letter on Alexander Herzen’s concept. Chaadayev was openly intriguing, as despite general societal silence he spoke out against the Russian state oppressing an individual. I pay attention to the fact that Herzen’s attempt to defend an individual appropriated by abstraction (the state, God, ideology, progress) stems from the sources of Chaadayev’s concepts. Herzen revalues Chaadayev’s idea of Russia free from the burden of history, shifting the focus from historiography to philosophical anthropology. Each individual becomes part of it, as originally we are all deprived of history, its burden, every man thrown into the world is not ready, undefined, the past does not exist for him, just as the presence exists and the future opens potentially with multiple variants.
2

Hercen i Bakunin. Analiza kontekstualna

84%
Uglik J.
Nowa Krytyka
|
2013
|
issue 30/31
195-208
EN
The presented article is a comparative study of the output of the two nineteenth century Russian thinkers, Alexander Herzen and Mikhail Bakunin. The author indicates the similarities and differences between theoretical concepts elaborated by both of them, trying to prove – sometimes at odds with other scholars – that the views of Herzen and Bakunin reveal more convergence than divergence.
3
Content available remote

Recepcja heglizmu w Rosji na przełomie lat trzydziesych i czterdziestych XIX wieku (Wissarion Bieliński, Aleksander Hercen, Iwan Turgieniew)

67%
Koprowski P.
Studia Rossica Gedanensia
|
2015
|
issue 2
180–195
PL
W artykule przybliżono specyfikę recepcji heglizmu w Rosji na przełomie lat trzydziestych i czterdziestych XIX wieku, przedstawiono dylematy ideowe i społeczno-moralne Wissariona Bielińskiego, Aleksandra Hercena i Iwana Turgieniewa, będących w tym okresie reprezentatywnymi rosyjskimi heglistami. Recepcja ta jest świadectwem fascynacji Rosjan nie tylko konstrukcjami teoretycznymi Hegla, ich wszechstronnym zakresem oraz przydatnością terminologiczną. Niemniej ważna jest też swoista współmierność tej filozofii z realną rosyjską rzeczywistością. Kiedy okazało się, że konstatacja ta nie może być utrzymana, rosyjscy myśliciele przestali hołubić Hegla. Zaczęli krytykować heglizm jako filozofię „oderwania od rzeczywistości”.
EN
In the article the specificity of the reception of the concepts of Hegel in Russia at the turn of the 30s and 40s of the 19th century is introduced. Special attention is paid to ideological and socio-moral dilemmas of Vissarion Belinsky, Alexander Herzen and Ivan Turgenev, for them being representative Russian Hegelians in this period. That reception proves the Russians’ fascination for not only theoretical structures of Hegel, but also their versatile scope and the terminological usefulness. Equally important is also some specific adequateness of this philosophy to Russian reality. When it turned out that this observation could not be held, Russian thinkers „turned themselves away” from Hegel. They started to criticize the philosophy of Hegel on the ground of its „detachment from reality”.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.