Search results

1

W poszukiwaniu tradycji o Izaaku

100%

Lemański J.

Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana

|

2013

|

issue 2

63-76

EN

Analysis of tradition devoted to Isaac leads to the conclusion that the character of the patriarch described a pattern known from the cycle of Abraham. Sometimes it almost a mirror image in an abbreviated form (as Gen. 26). Isaac is presented as a second Abraham, and his character is transferred from the patriarchal promises from Abraham to Jacob (Gen. 27). The prophet Amos (Amos 7,9.16), although his expressions are not yet satisfactorily explained, gives the impression that in the eighth century BC, there was a sense of connectedness between the character of Isaac localized in Beer Sheba and memory ethno-religious people of the Kingdom of Israel. Indeed the Prophet used the term “house of Isaac” parallel to the term “house of Jacob” and mentions the annual pilgrimage to the shrine of Northerners in Beer Sheba.

2

Řecké slovesné kategorie v knize Ámos

100%

Mackerle A.

Studia theologica

|

2015

|

vol. 1

18-44

EN

The Greek text of Amos has been studied thus far primarily from the point of view of the textual criticism and of the correspondence of words and expressions between the Hebrew and Greek texts. The present article concentrates on the verbal forms (Greek tenses and aspects) used by the translator. The first reason is to determine his strategy in applying these grammatical tools. The second reason is to use this study to better understand the nature of his translation, since the Greek verbal forms used by the translator mainly pertain to the translation process, and only in a lesser degree to the Vorlage. The author argues that the way the translator uses the Greek tenses reveals his fairly solid understanding of the Hebrew verbal forms in his Vorlage, but also a certain degree of negligence within the context of the entire book, especially in terms of what follows.

3

Gioele e Amos in dialogo secondo Massimiliano Scandroglio

87%

Zawadzki A.

Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne

|

2014

|

vol. 23

|

issue 4

121-127

PL

Artykuł jest próbą zrecenzowania książki Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative, opublikowanej nakładem Gregorian&Biblical Press w 2011 r. Książka wpisuje się w dość popularny w dzisiejszej biblistyce nurt egzegezy intertekstualnej, która jest nową odsłoną starej metody porównawczej, badającej związki i zależności pomiędzy poszczególnymi księgami biblijnymi i tym samym proces ich powstawania. Scandroglio skupia swoją uwagę przede wszystkim na rozdziale 4. Księgi Joela i konfrontuje go z rozdziałami 1. i 9. Księgi Amosa. De facto, wnikliwej analizie intertekstualnej zostają poddane następujące perykopy: Jl 4, 1–3/Am 9, 13–15; Jl 4, 4–8/Am 1, 3–2,16; Jl 4, 9–17/Am 1, 2; Jl 4, 18–2/Am 9, 13–15. Ponadto wychodząc od literackich związków między dwoma prorokami, Autor stara się uchwycić podobieństwa i różnice w ich przesłaniu teologicznym, czemu poświęcona jest druga część książki. Na uwagę czytelnika zasługuje przede wszystkim obszerna analiza dwóch teologicznych tematów, a mianowicie motyw „Dnia Pańskiego” i relacja Izraela z obcymi narodami. W Zakończeniu Autor stara się ukazać metodę intertekstualną w jej historycznym rozwoju i wpływ, jaki ma ona obecnie na egzegezę Księgi Joela i Amosa.

IT

La tesi dottorale di Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative, difesa al Pontificio Istituto Biblico di Roma il 4 giugno 2010, è uno studio articolato in due parti: nella prima parte il capitolo 4 di Gioele viene messo a confronto con alcuni versetti dei capitoli 1 e 9 del libro di Amos. I titoli dei rispettivi capitoli si riferiscono alle seguenti pericopi: Gl 4, 1–3 → Am 9, 13–15; Gl 4, 4–8 → Am 1, 3–2, 16; Gl 4, 9–17 → Am 1, 2; Gl 4, 18–21 → Am 9, 13–15, sebbene de facto ne vengano studiati soltanto alcuni versetti o espressioni. Dopo l’analisi dei versetti scelti, fatta nella prima parte del libro, l’Autore – nella seconda – propone una serie di riflessioni su due temi (il Giorno di JHWH in Gl 1, 15–20; 2, 1–11; 3, 1–5; 4, 1–3.9–17 e in Am 2, 6–16; 6, 1–7; 9, 1–4; 5, 18–20; e il rapporto tra Israele e le nazioni in Gl 4 e in Am 1–2; 3, 1–2; 6, 1–7; 9, 7–10), che costituiscono, a suo dire, “la base tematica”, su cui Gioele entra in dialogo con Amos. Nella Conclusione (pp. 339–367) viene offerta la panoramica generale sul cosiddetto “approccio intertestuale” e sulle conseguenze che esso ha per l’esegesi di Gioele ed Amos. Alla fine si trovano Bibliografia, Indice biblico e Indice degli autori.

EN

This article attempts to review a book by Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative which was published by Gregorian&Biblical Press w 2011. This book forms a part of the trend of intertextual exegesis which is popular in contemporary Bible studies. It is a new version of the old comparative method which researches the relations and interdependencies between individual books of the Bible and consequently the process of their formation. Scandroglio focuses mostly on the chapters 4 of the book of Joel and 1 and 9 of Amos. He thoroughly analyses the following excerpts: Jl 4, 1–3/Am 9, 13–15; Jl 4, 4–8/Am 1, 3–2, 16; Jl 4, 9–17/Am 1, 2; Jl 4, 18–2/Am 9, 13–15. Starting from literary connections between the two prophets, the author tries to find similarities and differences in their theological message and he devotes the second part of his book to this subject. Two theological subjects are particularly noteworthy: the topic of the Day of the Lord and the relation between Israel and gentile nations. In conclusion the author tries to present the intersexual method, its historic development and the influence which it currently has on the exegesis of the books of Joel and Amos.

4

Ubodzy w przepowiadaniu proroka Amosa (Am 2, 6b-7a; 4, 1b; 5, 11a; 12b i 8, 4. 6)

86%

Szwarc U.

The Biblical Annals

|

1988

|

vol. 35

|

issue 1

5-14

PL

The article deals with the teaching about the poor in the Book of Amos. The first part is a detailed analysis of Am. 2, 6b-7a; 4, 1b; 5, 11a. 12b; 8, 4. 6, concentrating on the Hagiographer’s terminology. The second part comprises more general conclusions. Our study leads to the conclusion that terms saddîq, ʽebjôn/ ʽebjônîm, dal/dallîm, ʽănawîm, ʽanwê- ʼareṣ, which denote the poor, are synonyms. Hence, the title saddîq is to be referred to poor, the ignored, the oppressed rather than solely to the rich and prominent as has traditionally been done. Furthermore, Amos stresses the personal dignity of those generally held in contempt and belonging to the lowest social strata. In expressing these truths, the Book of Amos is independent of the teachings of the wisdom writers.

5

La reception du Livre d’Amos par les peres. Proposition Methodologique

86%

Charpin-Ploix M. L.

Vox Patrum

|

2017

|

vol. 67

71-83

EN

Is the method of tracking scriptural references to determine the influence of a biblical book on the Fathers of the Church sufficient? Or, would it be more appropriate to expand our methodological resources by taking the convergence of different types of elements into account ? This article seeks to demonstrate the complementary nature of these methods through the example of the reception of the Book of Amos by four Fathers of the Church. The list of quotations by Justin Martyr, Ireanaeus, and Origen is used to perceive how they appeal to and interpret the Book of Amos, as well as the particular status they grant it. In addition to this initial method, a semantic and stylistic analysis of Basil of Caesarea’s Homily VIII reveals supplementary forms of the reception of Amos and thus indicates the important influence of the prophet on this Father and Doctor of the Church.

FR

Artykuł dotyczy recepcji księgi proroka Amosa u pisarzy chrześcijańskich jak Justyn, Ireneusz, Orygenes i Bazyli. Gdy chodzi o pierwszych trzech Autorka posługuje się metodą przytaczania i analizy cytatów z księgi Amosa, które znajdują się w dziełach tychże teologów. W takim przypadku wystarczy posłużyć się indeksem biblijnym, aby tego rodzaju cytaty odnaleźć. Jednakże Autorka stwierdza, że samo przytaczanie cytatów może okazać się niewystarczające, gdyż w niektórych pismach patrystycznych są aluzje do poszczególnych ksiąg biblijnych, nawet gdy nie ma wprost cytatów. Takie właśnie aluzje były zasygnalizowane w homiliach Bazylego Wielkiego: Homilia in illud: Destruam horrea mea (Luc 12, 18) oraz Homilia dicta tempore famis et siccitatis. Aluzje do proroka Amosa polegają na podobieństwie w sposobie omawiania poszczególnych zagadnień.

6

Prorok wobec zła i władzy (2 Sm 12,9)

72%

Korzec C.

Verbum Vitae

|

2008

|

vol. 14

17-38

PL

L’intervento di profeta Natan, racontato nel 2 Sam 12, smaschera Davide come committente della morte di Uria. Il male commesso e stato possibile grazie al potere reale del re di Israele. La situazione e una tra le molte racontate dalla Bibbia: il male trova spesso appoggio nel potere. Nell’articolo viene offerta una analisi detagliata del testo di Am 2,6-8 sotto questo aspetto. Il male che perverte la vita di Israele trova l’appoggio nelle istituzioni che sono state convocate per protteggere la santitià della vita del popolo di Dio. Nelia visione profetica della vita di società di cui testimoniaza offre Am 2,6-8 il male non e qualcosa banale o accidentale. È un vero proggetto portato avanti grazie all’esistenza delle vere strutture che ne danno appoggio.

Refine search results

1 Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana

1 Studia theologica

1 The Biblical Annals

1 Verbum Vitae

1 Vox Patrum

1 Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne

1 Charpin-Ploix M. L.

1 Korzec C.

1 Lemański J.

1 Mackerle A.

1 Szwarc U.

1 Zawadzki A.

1 2017

1 2015

1 2014

1 2013