Search results

1

List Konstantyna do Aleksandra i Ariusza a zwołanie Soboru Nicejskiego

100%

Pietras H.

Vox Patrum

|

2006

|

vol. 49

531-547

IT

L’articolo presenta il testo e il commento dełla lettera dell’Imperatore Costantino, l’unico documento legato alla controversia ariana, per il qual e possibile stabilire la data: fine settembre 324, dopo il ritorno di Costantino dalia guerra eon Licinio. L’analisi mette il rilievo l’opinione dell’Imperatore sull’importanza della controversia: che era di poco e che Alessandro e Ario dovrebbero far pace immediatamente.

2

Okoliczności zwołania Soboru Nicejskiego

100%

Grzywaczewski J.

Vox Patrum

|

2014

|

vol. 62

139-168

EN

The article presents the circumstances of the Council of Nicaea. There was a tradition to compose symbols of the faith (symbola fidei), and to organize synods. The Council of Nicaea was convoked by Emperor Constantine in cooperation with Pope Silvestre. After the victory on Licinius, Constantine wanted to arrange public and religious matters of the Empire. He was not a Christian but he was friendly to Christianity as a religion which he considered to be profitable for the Empire. He possessed the title of Pontifex maximus which authorized him to intervene not only in pagan cults, but also in ecclesiastical affaires. In spite of that, there were three main conflicts in that time: the date of the Passover, Donatism and Arianism. Donatism was a schism born in Latin Africa having a national background; it was a movement of the local population against the Roman administration. Arianism, born in Greek Africa, was inspired by philosophy, especially by Neo-Platonism. Constantine was welcomed by the Pope and other bishops because his actions were useful for the Church. People were waiting for the Council of Nicaea with hope.

3

Wokół soboru nicejskiego (325): na kanwie monografii autorstwa Henryka Pietrasa SJ

100%

Bralewski S.

Vox Patrum

|

2016

|

vol. 65

75-98

EN

The Council convened by emperor Constantine the Great to Nicea in the year 325 still arouses keen interest of researchers around the world. Against the background of international scholarship, the achievements of Polish academics look quite modest. That is why one should especially appreciate the publication of a book (written in Polish) on the subject by Henryk Pietras, an acclaimed Polish patrologist. The monograph is noteworthy for a number of reasons and compels the reader to a thorough reflection on a cornucopia of facts that have been already discussed by numerous academics and subject to manifold interpretations. Its special merit lies first and foremost in an erudite analysis of sources conducted by the Author, which is competent enough to exhort all the interested to (at least) re-think their views. It is necessary to admit that the Academic is right, when he argues that the Council (firstly convened to Ancyra, and subsequently to Nicea) was not organized for the reason of discussing the Arian controversy. In reality, it seems that the primary reason for the meeting was the Donatist schism, which the Patrologist underestimated, and additionally the problem of reaching an agreement on a date of the Passover celebration. Certainly, the Council was not of an anti-Arian nature, but Arius was condemned by the ecclesiastic meeting as the one who rejected a laboriously reached compromise as for the form of the credo and renounced the term homoousios.

4

Trzy rozumienia „generatio” w herezji Ariusza oraz sposoby ich przezwyciężenia w tekstach Tomasza z Akwinu

75%

Gałuszka J.

Rocznik Tomistyczny

|

2013

|

vol. 2

69-77

EN

In this article I present a philosophical considerations of theological heresy of presbyter Arius from the perspective of Aquinas’ criticism included in his works, with special honors Summa contra Gentiles. I show the role of Aristotle’s philosophy in creating the ancient Arianism, as well as its scholastic overcome. Analyzing the arguments of Arius, I familiarize myself with the concept of birthing Word as metaphysical substantial change, the transition from potency to act or movement perfecting. We are getting to know the thinking of Aquinas, exploring arguments of Alexandrian presbyter with the help of the same philosophy of Stagirite and winning this timeless intellectual startup.

Refine search results

3 Vox Patrum

1 Rocznik Tomistyczny

1 2016

1 2014

1 2013

1 2006

1 Bralewski S.

1 Gałuszka J.

1 Grzywaczewski J.

1 Pietras H.

List Konstantyna do Aleksandra i Ariusza a zwołanie Soboru Nicejskiego

Okoliczności zwołania Soboru Nicejskiego

Wokół soboru nicejskiego (325): na kanwie monografii autorstwa Henryka Pietrasa SJ

Trzy rozumienia „generatio” w herezji Ariusza oraz sposoby ich przezwyciężenia w tekstach Tomasza z Akwinu