Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  BUBER MARTIN
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

KAFKA AND BUBER. TESTIMONY AND IMPOSSIBILITY

100%
Czeglédi A.
ESPES
|
2021
|
vol. 10
|
issue 1
12 – 21
EN
“I also talked to Buber yesterday; as a person he is lively and simple and remarkable, and seems to have nothing to do with the lukewarm things he has written” – wrote Franz Kafka to his fiancée Felice Bauer in the early 1913. What is the meaning of this harsh, yet respectful portraiture of Buber? Was it a casual ironic remark – or was it rather the way Kafka really thought of Martin Buber? And to what extent was Kafka important for Buber? How can we understand the collaboration between the writer and philosopher? Close reading, contextualization and Begegnungsereign (encounter as fundamental event).
2

ON THE MEETING OF THE PHILOSOPHERS OF DIALOGUE

100%
Glinkowski W.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2006
|
issue 41
89-102
EN
The author tries to show similarities and distinctnesses between two conceptions of the 20-th century philosophy of dialogue formulated by Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig. Regardless of common elements in thoughts of both friend-thinkers there are some differents, what provokes into comparison their positions. We can also inquire of reasons, which make level discrepancies impossible. The main subject of Buber's consideration is double-image of reality as a consequence of twofold way of meeting with it. The first type of 'relation' (the proper one (Beziehung)) takes place when man attitude links to fundamental word 'Me-You' (Ich-Du). Second type of relation is called by Buber 'connection' (Verhaeltnis). It implements when man attitude links to word 'Me-It' (Ich-Es). The difference between these words (and similarily - between two attitudes) is evident. The word 'Me-It' makes the subject, involves concepts. By means of them a man builts conceptions of reality, but he doesn't experience its presence. Rosenzweig raises objections to this conception.
3

JUST ONE OR SINGLE? MARTIN BUBER ON ANTHROPOLOGICAL IDEAS OF KIERKEGAARD AND STIRNER

100%
Glinkowski W. P.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2005
|
issue 40
183-196
EN
In this text standpoints of Kierkegaard and Stirner concerning topic of human person have become a frame of reference, more or less critical, in comparison to conception of dialogical human being by Martin Buber. Buber and Kierkegaard get bring together, because both look for inspiration for their statements in religion experience. As distinct from the Individual of Kierkegaard the human being of Buber isn't isolating person who lonely appears before The Infinite, but human being participating in relations, especially in personal relationship. Buber gets closer to Stirner and Kierkegaard by antiheglism. They all want to reveal real existence of human being, they don't want to create a new another 'conception of human being'. Kierkegaard allows a relation with God, but Stirner's conception of The Unique turns down this relation, which caused an importand distinctness from dialogical perspective.
4

MARTIN BUBER AS THE 'FEUERBACHIAN THINKER'

100%
Kossowska A.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2006
|
issue 42
85-102
EN
The text shows the relation between German philosophers: Feuerbach and Buber, in the light of not widely known roots of the philosophy of dialogue which was Feuerbach's concept of Me-You. Both authors appreciate the crucial role of religion, even though Feuerbach was consider an atheist and Buber - an eulogist of Hasssids.
5

O SIONISMU A OBNOVĚ ŽIDOVSTVÍ V PŘED DIALOGICKÉM DÍLE MARTINA BUBERA

88%
Zvada Ľ.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 6
490 – 499
EN
This article explains Martin Buber’s pre-dialogical philosophy. In this paper, the author analyses key thoughts expressed by Martin Buber on Judaism and Zionism. This essay mainly focuses on Buber’s thinking about the concept of the so-called ‘Jewish renaissance’, which Buber discusses in many of his essays, articles and especially in his book entitled Three speeches on Judaism. This is Buber’s most important work concerning Judaism written during his pre-dialogical period.
6

STRETNUTIE S V. E. FRANKLOM

88%
Roman D.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2008
|
vol. 63
|
issue 4
324-327
EN
The contribution tries to shed light on one part of V. E. Frankl intellectual legacy and to give an interpretation of some of his ideas. The author focuses on the phenomenon of 'encounter', rooted in Martin Buber's philosophy. Further he deals with the dialogical character and personal meaning of this event as developed in personalism and philosophy of dialogue. The next step is the discussion of 'the will to meaning' and the conception of V. E. Frankl in the various contexts. The author even finds an analogy between Frankl's and Levinas' conceptions, in particular in Levinas' understanding of desire and need, in the problems of existentional vacuum and reductionism, as well as in his 'tacit dialogue' with himself, which, through the self-transcendence touches the meaning.
7

TOWARDS A DIALOGICAL PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION: BUBER’S AMBIVALENT RECEPTION OF KIERKEGAARD

75%
Šajda P.
Verba Theologica. Teologický časopis
|
2020
|
vol. 19
|
issue 1
5 – 15
EN
Martin Buber is a well-known representative of dialogical philosophy who wrote extensively on the topic of religion. He developed his own philosophy of religion and engaged in polemics with other philosophers of religion on the importance of dialogical elements in this field of study. In this paper I examine his complex polemic with Søren Kierkegaard which is part of Buber’s larger project of developing dialogical philosophy of religion. Buber’s approach to Kierkegaard is ambivalent: on the one hand he considers Kierkegaard as a precursor to dialogical philosophy. On the other hand he claims that Kierkegaard compromises basic Christian doctrines. Buber adopts dialogical notions elaborated by Kierkegaard and develops them further while rejecting those notions that he deems incompatible with the dialogical approach. The philosophical-religious issue of the individual’s relation to God is at the center of Buber’s polemic.
8
Content available remote

RETHINKING DRAMA IN THE CRISIS OF DELIBERATIVE COMMUNICATION: THE RADICAL THEORY OF MARTIN BUBER AND GUSTAV LANDAUER

63%
Motal J.
Slovenské divadlo (Slovak Theatre)
|
2021
|
vol. 69
|
issue 3
290 – 306
EN
The article presents the basic elements of Gustav Landauer’s and Martin Buber’s thinking on theatre and drama. It shows they are rooted in the late 19th-century critique of language (Sprachkritik), trying to overcome the representational function of language. The author searches for shared elements in both thinkers’ philosophies: an integral idea of human personality (inner necessity), spirituality as a super-personal unity tending towards a communitarian vision of the people, and so on. While Buber emphasizes the unity of opposites, or the union of the characters in the drama while preserving their differences, Landauer focuses on achieving unity with the ancestors and the cosmos through an inner immersion. Both direct their theory of drama towards political meaning. This paper proposes that their concept of drama can be used to rethink communication, transcending the post-politics of consensus, as it preserves difference in unity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.