Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Slavica Wratislaviensia

Years help

  1. 1 2017

Authors help

  1. 1 Karasiński A.

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Balkanology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Tendencja rozwojowa futurum w języku serbskim w świetle bałkanologii

100%
Karasiński A.
Slavica Wratislaviensia
|
2017
|
vol. 165
209-216
EN
The article presents the clash of two tendencies in Serbian future tense — so-called balkan type construction of the conjunction da and conjugated verb form: ја ću da pišem and slavic, inflection­al construction where the auxiliary verb is transformed into an ending: pisaću. These two forms are often used instead of normative infinitive form: ja ću pisati and this is acontamination of two types of construction — balkan and nonbalkan (slavic).
HR
Članak predstavlja sukob dve tendencije usrpskom budućem vremenu (futur I) – iz jedne strane takozvani balkanski oblik futura izražen sintagmom da + prezent na primer ја ću da pišem, s druge strane „slovenski oblik“ kad nema predhodne reči – enklitika glagola hteti dolazi iza infiniti­va ispaja se s njim: pisaću.Ova dva oblika koristi se umesto normalnog oblika futura s infinitivom: ja ću pisati iovo je kontaminacija balkanskog inebalkanskog (slavenskog) oblika.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.